Cited by 392Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsBusiness Strategies and Management ResearchBusiness and Management Studies

Template Analysis for Business and Management Students

King, Nigel, Brooks, Joanna M.·2017·SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks

Abstract

Part of SAGE’s Mastering Business Research Methods, conceived and edited by Bill Lee, Mark N. K. Saunders and Vadake K. Narayanan and designed to support researchers by providing in-depth and practical guidance on using a chosen method of data collection or analysis. In Template Analysis for Business and Management Students Nigel King and Joanna Brookes guide you through the origins of template analysis and its place in qualitative research, its basic components, and the main strengths and limitations of this method. Practical case studies and examples from published research then guide you through how to use it in your own research project. Ideal for Business and Management students reading for a Master’s degree, each book in the series may also serve as a reference book for doctoral students and faculty members interested in the method. Watch the editors introduce the Mastering Business Research Methods series and tell you more about the first three books.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4135/9781473983304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Template analysis was employed using a critical perspective, arguing that realities exist independent of human activity and that situations outside participants' control may not directly determine behaviour but are recognized as important influences in understanding experience.

    “Template analysis as a method of qualitative data analysis is philosophically flexible, but has been employed in this study using a critical perspective ([29]; p.15), whereby we argue “realities which exist independent of human activity””
  • The iterative approach to coding and quotation selection meant that when saturation was reached, transcripts could be compared to ensure the most illustrative quotations were selected.

    “The iterative approach to coding and quotation selection meant, when saturation of data and themes had been reached, transcripts could be compared to ensure the most illustrative quotations were selected and presented in the results section which follows [29].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, N., & Brooks, J. M.
Venue
SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks
Published
2017
OpenAlex
W2590250792
Cited by
392
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
27.46
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
Keywords
template analysis, qualitative data analysis, qualitative research, business research methods, management research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review