Cited by 122Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchRenal and related cancers

Prospective isolation and global gene expression analysis of definitive and visceral endoderm

Open access
Sherwood, Richard I., Jitianu, Cristian, Cleaver, Ondine, Shaywitz, David A., Lamenzo, Julia O., Chen, Alice E., Golub, Todd R., Melton, Douglas A.·2007·Developmental Biology

Abstract

In spite of the therapeutic importance of endoderm derivatives such as the pancreas, liver, lung, and intestine, there are few molecular markers specific for early endoderm. In order to identify endoderm-specific genes as well as to define transcriptional differences between definitive and visceral endoderm, we performed microarray analysis on E8.25 definitive and visceral endoderm. We have developed an early endoderm gene expression signature, and clarified the transcriptional similarities and differences between definitive and visceral endoderm. Additionally, we have developed methods for flow cytometric isolation of definitive and visceral endoderm. These results shed light on the mechanism of endoderm formation and should facilitate investigation of endoderm formation from embryonic stem cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherwood, R. I., Jitianu, C., Cleaver, O., Shaywitz, D. A., Lamenzo, J. O., Chen, A. E., Golub, T. R., & Melton, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sherwood, Richard I.
  • Melton, Douglas A.
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
304
Issue
2
Pages
541-555
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001429836
Cited by
122
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Renal and related cancers
Keywords
definitive endoderm, visceral endoderm, transcriptional differences, endoderm formation, embryonic stem cells, mouse embryo
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Endoderm, Mesoderm, Mice, Transgenic, Viscera, Gene Expression, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Multipotent Stem Cells, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review