The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Muscle satellite cells are a functionally heterogeneous population in both somite-derived and branchiomeric muscles
Open accessAbstract
Skeletal muscles of body and limb are derived from somites, but most head muscles originate from cranial mesoderm. The resident stem cells of muscle are satellite cells, which have the same embryonic origin as the muscle in which they reside. Here, we analysed satellite cells with a different ontology, comparing those of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) of the limb with satellite cells from the masseter of the head. Satellite cell-derived myoblasts from MAS and EDL muscles had distinct gene expression profiles and masseter cells usually proliferated more and differentiated later than those from EDL. When transplanted, however, masseter-derived satellite cells regenerated limb muscles as efficiently as those from EDL. Clonal analysis showed that functional properties differed markedly between satellite cells: ranging from clones that proliferated extensively and gave rise to both differentiated and self-renewed progeny, to others that divided minimally before differentiating completely. Generally, masseter-derived clones were larger and took longer to differentiate than those from EDL. This distribution in cell properties was preserved in both EDL-derived and masseter-derived satellite cells from old mice, although clones were generally less proliferative. Satellite cells, therefore, are a functionally heterogeneous population, with many occupants of the niche exhibiting stem cell characteristics in both somite-derived and branchiomeric muscles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment
Conboy, I. M., Conboy, M. J., Wagers, A. J., Girma, E. R., Weissman, I. L., & Rando, T. A. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03260 · Cited by 2,287
X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse
Bulfield, G., Siller, W. G., Wight, P. A., & Moore, K. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.4.1189 · Cited by 1,765
Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle
Kuang, S., Kuroda, K., Le Grand, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.044 · Cited by 1,449
Collins, C. A., Olsen, I., Zammit, P. S., Heslop, L., Petrie, A., Partridge, T. A., & Morgan, J. E. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.010 · Cited by 1,445
Self-citationDirect Isolation of Satellite Cells for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration
Montarras, D., Morgan, J., Collins, C., Relaix, F., Zaffran, S., Cumano, A., Partridge, T., & Buckingham, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1114758 · Cited by 1,100
Self-citationSelf-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells
Sacco, A., Doyonnas, R., Kraft, P., Vitorovic, S., & Blau, H. M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07384 · Cited by 901
A single type of progenitor cell maintains normal epidermis
Clayton, E., Doupé, D. P., Klein, A. M., Winton, D. J., Simons, B. D., & Jones, P. H. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05574 · Cited by 853
Muscle transplantation between young and old rats: age of host determines recovery
Carlson, B. M., & Faulkner, J. A. (1989) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1989.256.6.c1262 · Cited by 417
A Population of Myogenic Stem Cells That Survives Skeletal Muscle Aging
Collins, C. A., Zammit, P. S., Ruiz, A. P., Morgan, J. E., & Partridge, T. A. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0372 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Cited by
Satellite Cells and the Muscle Stem Cell Niche
Yin, H., Price, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2011 · Cited by 2,166
Building Muscle: Molecular Regulation of Myogenesis
Bentzinger, C. F., Wang, Y. X., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2012) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008342 · Cited by 1,195
Zammit, P. S. (2017) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.011 · Cited by 887
Control of satellite cell function in muscle regeneration and its disruption in ageing
Sousa-Victor, P., García-Prat, L., & Muñoz-Cánoves, P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00421-2 · Cited by 476
Ito, N., Ruegg, U. T., Kudo, A., Miyagoe-Suzuki, Y., & Takeda, S. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3019 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Ono, Y., Boldrin, L., Knopp, P., Morgan, J. E., & Zammit, P. S.
- Venue
- Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-41
- ISSN
- 0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986973204
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Muscle satellite cells are a functionally heterogeneous population in both somite-derived and branchiomeric muscles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.005
- The paper
- Ono, Y., Boldrin, L., Knopp, P., Morgan, J. E., & Zammit, P. S. (2010). Muscle satellite cells are a functionally heterogeneous population in both somite-derived and branchiomeric muscles. Developmental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
