Cited by 81Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMemory and Neural MechanismsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Oxytocin receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell are involved in the consolidation of maternal memory in postpartum rats

D'Cunha, T.M., King, S.J., Fleming, A.S., Lévy, F.·2011·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Female rats with maternal experience display a shorter onset of maternal responsiveness compared to those with no prior experience. This phenomenon called 'maternal memory' is critically dependent on the nucleus accumbens (NA) shell. We hypothesized that activation of OT receptors in the NA shell facilitates maternal memory. In Experiment 1, postpartum female rats given 1 hour of maternal experience were infused following the experience with either a high or low dose of an OT antagonist into the NA shell and tested for maternal behavior after a 10-day pup isolation period. Females receiving a high dose of the antagonist showed a significantly longer latency to exhibit full maternal behavior after the pup isolation period compared to females that received vehicle or a high dose of antagonist in a control region. In Experiment 2, postpartum female rats were infused with either a high or low dose of OT into the NA shell after a 15-minute maternal experience and tested for maternal behavior after a 10-day pup isolation period. There were no significant differences between the females infused with OT and females treated with a vehicle infused into the NA shell or with OT infused into the control region. One possible reason for a lack of facilitation is a floor effect, since females in the control groups displayed a rapid maternal response after the pup isolation period. These findings suggest that OT receptors, likely in combination with other neurotransmitters, in the NA shell pl…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.09.007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Cunha, T. M., King, S. J., Fleming, A. S., & Lévy, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Fleming, A.S.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
14-21
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008023580
Cited by
81
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
oxytocin receptor, nucleus accumbens shell, maternal memory, maternal behavior, memory consolidation, postpartum women, oxytocin antagonist, maternal responsiveness
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Maternal Behavior, Memory, Nucleus Accumbens, Oxytocin, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Oxytocin, Postpartum Period, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review