Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: A practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography

Open access
Trabuco, Leonardo G., Villa, Elizabeth, Schreiner, Eduard, Harrison, Christopher B., Schulten, Klaus·2009·Methods

Abstract

Hybrid computational methods for combining structural data from different sources and resolutions are becoming an essential part of structural biology, especially as the field moves toward the study of large macromolecular assemblies. We have developed the molecular dynamics flexible fitting (MDFF) method for combining high-resolution atomic structures with cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps, that results in atomic models representing the conformational state captured by cryo-EM. The method has been applied successfully to the ribosome, a ribonucleoprotein complex responsible for protein synthesis. MDFF involves a molecular dynamics simulation in which a guiding potential, based on the cryo-EM map, is added to the standard force field. Forces proportional to the gradient of the density map guide an atomic structure, available from X-ray crystallography, into high-density regions of a cryo-EM map. In this paper we describe the necessary steps to set up, run, and analyze MDFF simulations and the software packages that implement the corresponding functionalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.04.005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Trabuco, L. G., Villa, E., Schreiner, E., Harrison, C. B., & Schulten, K.
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
174-180
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089638270
Cited by
345
References
2
FWCI
9.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.