Cited by 30Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorProtein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

‘Assembly and analysis of cell-scale membrane envelopes’

Open access
Vermaas, Josh V., Mayne, Christopher G., Shinn, Eric, Tajkhorshid, Emad·2022·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

The march toward exascale computing will enable routine molecular simulation of larger and more complex systems, for example, simulation of entire viral particles, on the scale of approximately billions of atoms─a simulation size commensurate with a small bacterial cell. Anticipating the future hardware capabilities that will enable this type of research and paralleling advances in experimental structural biology, efforts are currently underway to develop software tools, procedures, and workflows for constructing cell-scale structures. Herein, we describe our efforts in developing and implementing an efficient and robust workflow for construction of cell-scale membrane envelopes and embedding membrane proteins into them. A new approach for construction of massive membrane structures that are stable during the simulations is built on implementing a subtractive assembly technique coupled with the development of a structure concatenation tool (fastmerge), which eliminates overlapping elements based on volumetric criteria rather than adding successive molecules to the simulation system. Using this approach, we have constructed two "protocells" consisting of MARTINI coarse-grained beads to represent cellular membranes, one the size of a cellular organelle and another the size of a small bacterial cell. The membrane envelopes constructed here remain whole during the molecular dynamics simulations performed and exhibit water flux only through specific proteins, demonstrating the success of our methodology in creating tight cell-like membrane compartments. Extended simulations of these cell-scale structures highlight the propensity for nonspecific interactions between adjacent membrane proteins leading to the formation of protein microclusters on the cell surface, an insight uniquely enabled by the scale of the simulations. We anticipate that the experiences and best practices presented here will form the basis for the next generation of cell-scale models, which will begin to address the addition of soluble proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules essential to the function of a cell.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01050

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous works on large-scale membrane-enveloped systems have shown that finding the balance of interior solvent and lipid leaflets is a non-trivial task.

    “Previous works on large-scale membrane-enveloped systems (Pezeshkian et al., 2021; Vermaas et al., 2022) have shown that finding this balance is a non-trivial task.”

    From Molecular dynamics simulation of an entire cell (2023) · cites this paper as Vermaas et al., 2022

  • Unbalanced systems might experience strong osmotic pressures and membrane (curvature) stress, causing unwanted shape deformations all the way to membrane rupture.

    “Unbalanced systems might experience strong osmotic pressures and membrane (curvature) stress, causing unwanted shape deformations all the way to membrane rupture.”

    From Molecular dynamics simulation of an entire cell (2023) · cites this paper as Vermaas et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vermaas, J. V., Mayne, C. G., Shinn, E., & Tajkhorshid, E.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vermaas, Josh V.
  • Tajkhorshid, Emad
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2021-12-15
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
602-617
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W4200276510
Cited by
30
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41-GM104601)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
protocells, Martini coarse-grained model, bacterial membranes, water flux, molecular dynamics simulation, simulation workflow
MeSH terms
Cell Membrane, Membrane Proteins, Software, Water, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review