Cited by 126Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion and Society Interactions

Surrender to God and stress: A possible link between religiosity and health.

Clements, Andrea D., Ermakova, Anna V.·2012·Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

Abstract

An abundance of evidence supports that stress predicts poor health, and religiosity, broadly defined, typically predicts good health. It is possible that one mechanism by which religiosity positively impacts health is through reduction in or prevention of the stress response, and that Surrender (Surrender to God) is a measure that captures aspects of religiosity that would predict lowered stress levels. In the present investigation, two samples were studied in order to investigate the relationship between one characterization of religiosity (Surrender) and stress. Participants in Study 1 were 460 (306 female) Southern Appalachian undergraduate university students who completed the Surrender Scale (Wong-McDonald & Gorsuch, 2000) and the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Spielberger, 1983) online during spring 2009. Study 2 utilized a high-risk (low income and/or high pregnancy risk) sample of 230 pregnant women involved in a longitudinal study who completed the Surrender Scale and the Prenatal Psychosocial Profile (PPP, Curry, Campbell, & Christian, 1994), which contains an 11-item stress measure, during their first research contact early in pregnancy. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that Surrender was consistently inversely related to stress on both the STAI and the PPP. These findings contribute to the current understanding of the religiosity–health association in two ways. First, they offer support for Surrender and its associated lower stress levels to be explored as a mechanism by which religiosity influences health. Second, findings support the exploration of the potential for stress reduction through increasing Surrender in reportedly religious individuals. (APA PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0025109

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many pathways have been proposed to explain how religion and spirituality may exert salutary influences on well-being.

    “Many pathways have been proposed to explain how religion and spirituality may exert salutary influences on well-being (Clements & Ermakova, 2012; Fitchett & Canada, 2010; Lee & Newberg, 2005; Levin & Vanderpool, 1989; Masters, 2008; Oman & Thoresen, 2005; Park, 2007; see Aldwin et al., 2014, for a review).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clements, A. D., & Ermakova, A. V.
Affiliations
East Tennessee State University (US)
Venue
Psychology of Religion and Spirituality
Published
2012-05
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
93-107
ISSN
  • 1941-1022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-1562
OpenAlex
W2144050671
Cited by
123
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Tennessee Governor’s Office on Children’s Care Coordination
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
submission to God, religiosity, stress, stress reduction, religiosity and health, anxiety, pregnancy, prenatal stress, low-income pregnant women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review