Cited by 412Urban Transport and AccessibilityUrban Green Space and HealthPhysical Activity and Health

Association of access to parks and recreational facilities with the physical activity of young children

Roemmich, James N., Epstein, Leonard H., Raja, Samina, Yin, Li, Robinson, Jodie, Winiewicz, Dana·2006·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective To determine associations of the neighborhood and home television environments with young children's physical activity.Method 32 boys and 27 girls age 4 to 7 years wore accelerometers for 3 weekdays and 1 weekend day. The number of televisions in the home and television watching of the child were monitored using TV Allowance units for 3 weeks. A geographic information system was used to measure neighborhood environment variables.Results Hierarchical regression analysis was used to predict physical activity, initially controlling for sex, age, socioeconomic status, adiposity, and child television watching in step 1. In step 2, the number of televisions did not significantly increase the amount of variability accounted for in the prediction of physical activity. In step 3, housing density and the interaction of housing density by sex accounted for an incremental 12% (p < 0.05) of the variability and in step 4 percentage park plus recreation area accounted for a further 10% (p < 0.05) of the variability. Greater housing density predicted increased physical activity of boys, but not girls.Conclusion Neighborhoods with increased proximity between homes and a greater proportion of park area are associated with greater physical activity in young children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.007

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There may be enormous disparities in access to online/active opportunities based on household financial considerations, digital technology access, house and yard size, and neighborhood safety and traffic volume.

    “However, there may be enormous disparities in access to these opportunities based on household financial considerations, digital technology access, house and yard size, and neighborhood safety and traffic volume [7–11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roemmich, J. N., Epstein, L. H., Raja, S., Yin, L., Robinson, J., & Winiewicz, D.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Roemmich, James N.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
437-441
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097752401
Cited by
412
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 22
FWCI
46.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University at Buffalo
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK063442)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
physical activity, young children, neighborhood environment, housing density, television viewing, sex differences, built environment, accelerometry
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Environment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Motor Activity, New York, Play and Playthings, Public Facilities, Recreation, Regression Analysis, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors, Television, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review