Cited by 135Physical Activity and HealthPhysical Education and PedagogySchool Health and Nursing Education

Physical activity and academic achievement across the curriculum: Results from a 3-year cluster-randomized trial

Open access
Donnelly, Joseph E., Hillman, Charles H., Greene, Jerry L., Hansen, David M., Gibson, Cheryl A., Sullivan, Debra K., Poggio, John, Mayo, Matthew S. +9 more·2017·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

We compared changes in academic achievement across 3 years between children in elementary schools receiving the Academic Achievement and Physical Activity Across the Curriculum intervention (A+PAAC), in which classroom teachers were trained to deliver academic lessons using moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared to a non-intervention control. Elementary schools in eastern Kansas (n=17) were cluster randomized to A+PAAC (N=9, target ≥ 100 min/wk.) or control (N=8). Academic achievement (math, reading, spelling) was assessed using the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition (WIAT-III) in a sample of children (A+PAAC = 316, Control = 268) in grades 2 and 3 at baseline (Fall 2011) and repeated each spring across 3 years. On average 55 min/wk. of A+PACC lessons were delivered each week across the intervention. Baseline WIAT-III scores (math, reading, spelling) were significantly higher in students in A+PAAC compared with control schools and improved in both groups across 3 years. However, linear mixed modeling, accounting for baseline between group differences in WIAT-III scores, ethnicity, family income, and cardiovascular fitness, found no significant impact of A+PAAC on any of the academic achievement outcomes as determined by non-significant group by time interactions. A+PAAC neither diminished or improved academic achievement across 3-years in elementary school children compared with controls. Our target of 100 min./wk. of active lessons was not achieved; however, students attending A+PAAC schools received an additional 55 min./wk. of MVPA which may be associated with both physical and mental health benefits, without a reduction in time devoted to academic instruction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.006

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Donnelly et al. [43] found no significant (p > 0.5) intervention effects on mathematics, reading, and spelling performance.

    “Likewise, a study conducted by Donnelly et al. [43] compared academic performance across a group receiving a moderate to vigorous PA intervention and a group that followed the regular curriculum and found no significant (p > 0.5) intervention effects on mathematics, reading, and spelling performance.”

    From The Effects of Physical Activity on Academic Performance in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results (Primary Outcome—Academic Achievement, Table 3; page unavailable) report no significant intervention effect on mathematics, reading comprehension fluency, or spelling, supporting the main finding. The passages do not establish the claimed p > 0.5 threshold; the Methods specify a 5% significance level, which is p < 0.05. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most studies investigating the effects of school-based PA interventions on academic performance are implemented among primary school children.

    “Most studies investigating the effects of school-based PA interventions on academic performance are implemented among primary school children [7, 8, 10, 11].”

    From Effects of a school-based physical activity intervention on academic performance in 14-year old adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial – the School in Motion study (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract describes this trial as an intervention in elementary schools, and the Discussion identifies several other studies of physically active lessons and academic achievement in elementary school children. The paper does not establish that primary-school studies make up most school-based physical-activity intervention studies across all age groups. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of the eight studies that analysed effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects, three used standardised test results, one measured mastery of the basic facts test, and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test.

    “Of the eight studies that analysed the effects on academic performance, four used grades in academic subjects [40,48,49,50]; meanwhile, three studies utilised standardised test results [43,49,55], one took measurements of the student’s mastery of the basic facts test [47], and one analysed mathematics and reading performance with the speed test arithmetic and the 1 min test [45].”
  • Donnelly et al. [43] reported improvements for both groups across all three academic performance indicators.

    “However, improvements were reported for both groups across all three academic performance indicators.”
  • In ScIM, both interventions included additional PE, which LCoMotion, The Active Smarter Kids and Academic Achievement and Physical Activity Across the Curriculum study did not.

    “In ScIM, both interventions included additional PE, which LCoMotion, The Active Smarter Kids and Academic Achievement and Physical Activity Across the Curriculum study did not.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Morgan PJ Bourke SF 2005 An investigation of pre-service and primary school teachers’ perspectives of PE teaching and confidence and PE teacher education ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal 52 7 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, J. E., Hillman, C. H., Greene, J. L., Hansen, D. M., Gibson, C. A., Sullivan, D. K., Poggio, J., Mayo, M. S., Lambourne, K., Szabo-Reed, A. N., Herrmann, S. D., Honas, J. J., Scudder, M. R., Betts, J. L., Henley, K., Hunt, S. L., & Washburn, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Donnelly, Joseph E.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
99
Pages
140-145
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587605749
Cited by
135
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-DK85317, F32-DK103493)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
physical activity, academic performance, elementary school students, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, spelling, cardiorespiratory fitness, teacher professional development
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Child, Curriculum, Female, Humans, Kansas, Male, Schools, Students, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review