Cited by 1,864Physical Activity and HealthChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentPhysical Education and Pedagogy

Physical Activity, Fitness, Cognitive Function, and Academic Achievement in Children: A Systematic Review

Open access
Donnelly, Joseph E., Hillman, Charles H., Castelli, Darla, Etnier, Jennifer L., Lee, Sarah, Tomporowski, Phillip, Lambourne, Kate, Szabo-Reed, Amanda N.·2016·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship among physical activity (PA), fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children is receiving considerable attention. The utility of PA to improve cognition and academic achievement is promising but uncertain; thus, this position stand will provide clarity from the available science. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: 1) among children age 5-13 yr, do PA and physical fitness influence cognition, learning, brain structure, and brain function? 2) Among children age 5-13 yr, do PA, physical education (PE), and sports programs influence standardized achievement test performance and concentration/attention? STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This study used primary source articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals. Articles that presented data on, PA, fitness, or PE/sport participation and cognition, learning, brain function/structure, academic achievement, or concentration/attention were included. DATA SOURCES: Two separate searches were performed to identify studies that focused on 1) cognition, learning, brain structure, and brain function and 2) standardized achievement test performance and concentration/attention. PubMed, ERIC, PsychInfo, SportDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier, and Embase were searched (January 1990-September 2014) for studies that met inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies met inclusion criteria for the first search (cognition/learning/brain), and 73 studies met inclusion criteria for the second search (academic achievement/concentration). STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Articles were grouped by study design as cross-sectional, longitudinal, acute, or intervention trials. Considerable heterogeneity existed for several important study parameters; therefore, results were synthesized and presented by study design. RESULTS: A majority of the research supports the view that physical fitness, single bouts of PA, and PA interventions benefit children's cognitive functioning. Limited evidence was available concerning the effects of PA on learning, with only one cross-sectional study meeting the inclusion criteria. Evidence indicates that PA has a relationship to areas of the brain that support complex cognitive processes during laboratory tasks. Although favorable results have been obtained from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies related to academic achievement, the results obtained from controlled experiments evaluating the benefits of PA on academic performance are mixed, and additional, well-designed studies are needed. LIMITATIONS: Limitations in evidence meeting inclusion criteria for this review include lack of randomized controlled trials, limited studies that are adequately powered, lack of information on participant characteristics, failure to blind for outcome measures, proximity of PA to measurement outcomes, and lack of accountability for known confounders. Therefore, many studies were ranked as high risk for bias because of multiple design limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The present systematic review found evidence to suggest that there are positive associations among PA, fitness, cognition, and academic achievement. However, the findings are inconsistent, and the effects of numerous elements of PA on cognition remain to be explored, such as type, amount, frequency, and timing. Many questions remain regarding how to best incorporate PA within schools, such as activity breaks versus active lessons in relation to improved academic achievement. Regardless, the literature suggests no indication that increases in PA negatively affect cognition or academic achievement and PA is important for growth and development and general health. On the basis of the evidence available, the authors concluded that PA has a positive influence on cognition as well as brain structure and function; however, more research is necessary to determine mechanisms and long-term effect as well as strategies to translate laboratory findings to the school environment. Therefore, the evidence category rating is B. The literature suggests that PA and PE have a neutral effect on academic achievement. Thus, because of the limitations in the literature and the current information available, the evidence category rating for academic achievement is C.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000000901

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dose-response for both moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and vigorous physical activity are positively associated with grade point average, with stronger effects observed for vigorous physical activity.

    “Dose-response for both MVPA and VPA were positively associated with GPA, with stronger effects observed for VPA (Alfaro-Chaverri et al., 2025; Donnelly et al., 2016; Renke et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2025).”

    From Physical activity and academic performance in adolescents: a systematic review of intensity, frequency, and mediating factors (2026) · cites this paper as Donnelly et al., 2016

    The Results section (‘Physical Activity and Academic Achievement’; page unavailable) reports that some studies found positive associations between physical activity and academic test scores, but the cross-sectional findings were mixed. It does not establish a dose-response association for both MVPA and VPA with GPA or report stronger effects for VPA. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Literature including child and adolescent populations suggests that PA positively influences AP, as more active students show better AP, even if there is only limited evidence.

    “Literature including child and adolescent populations suggests that PA positively influences AP, as more active students show better AP [18,19], even if there is only limited evidence [20,21].”

    From The Tridirectional Relationship among Physical Activity, Stress, and Academic Performance in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results section reports that findings tend toward a positive relationship and describes studies in which more active children had higher academic achievement. It also says the findings are mixed and the evidence is limited; its overall evidence statement describes the effect of PA on academic achievement as neutral, so it does not support a general claim that PA positively influences achievement. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ECA may support achievement by providing structured, adult-supervised contexts that foster self-regulation, persistence, motivation, peer integration and school engagement.

    “ECA may support achievement by providing structured, adult-supervised contexts that foster self-regulation, persistence, motivation, peer integration and school engagement (Contreras-Osorio et al., 2021;Donnelly et al., 2016;Eccles et al., 2003;Fredricks & Eccles, 2006;Román-Caballero et al., 2022;Singh et al., 2019;Váradi, 2022).”

    From Participation in extracurricular activities predicts academic growth and mediates socioeconomic inequalities in primary school (2026) · cites this paper as Donnelly et al., 2016

    The Introduction links physical activity, executive function and self-regulation to learning, and the Conclusions report associations with academic achievement. But the Results state that no sports-program studies met the review’s inclusion criteria; the paper does not establish that structured, adult-supervised extracurricular activities foster persistence, motivation, peer integration or school engagement. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aerobic fitness is a predictor of academic performance.

    “This is significant as several studies state that aerobic fitness is a predictor of academic performance [67,68,69].”
  • Part of the effect of physical activity on academic achievement is likely mediated via the brain's executive functions.

    “Part of the effect of PA on AA is likely mediated via the brain’s executive functions [17], with PA inducing, neural growth and modification in synaptic transmission, resulting in changes in thinking, decision-making, and, particularly in the prefrontal cortex [18].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 170 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [39]Cohen NJ Eichenbaum H Memory, Amnesia, and The Hippocampal System Cambridge, MA 1993
  2. [85]Hillman CH Pontifex MB Castelli DM Effects of the FITKids randomized controlled trial on executive control and brain function Pediatrics 2014 134 4 e1063 71 25266425 PMC4179093
  3. [115]Mokgothu CJ Gallagher JD Effects of aerobic fitness on attention, memory and decision-making in children International Journal of Body Composition Research 2010 8 37 44

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnelly, J. E., Hillman, C. H., Castelli, D., Etnier, J. L., Lee, S., Tomporowski, P., Lambourne, K., & Szabo-Reed, A. N.
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2016-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1197-1222
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2396881340
Cited by
1,864
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 183 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 204 · 2022: 241 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 224 · 2019: 174 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 19
FWCI
15.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F32DK103493)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
physical activity, physical fitness, cognitive function, academic performance, children, brain structure, brain function, learning, physical education, sports participation, standardized achievement tests, attention, concentration, exercise intervention
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Physical Fitness, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review