Cited by 168Physical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing EducationPhysical Education and Pedagogy

Improving Academic Performance of School-Age Children by Physical Activity in the Classroom: 1-Year Program Evaluation

Open access
Mullender‐Wijnsma, Marijke J., Hartman, Esther, de Greeff, Johannes W., Bosker, Roel J., Doolaard, Simone, Visscher, Chris·2015·Journal of School Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An intervention was designed that combined physical activity with learning activities. It was based upon evidence for positive effects of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) on academic achievement. The aim of this study was to describe the program implementation and effects on academic achievement after 1 year. METHODS: Second‐ and third‐grade classes of 6 elementary schools were included in the study. The intervention group participated in physically active academic lessons and the control group in regular classroom lessons. Implementation measures were obtained and the children were pretested and posttested on mathematics and reading. RESULTS: Teacher observations and self‐reports indicated that the lessons were implemented as planned. Classroom observations showed that children's on‐task behavior during the lessons was above 70%. On the basis of heart rate measures, on average 64% of the lesson time was spent in MVPA. Posttest mathematics and reading scores of third‐grade children who participated in the intervention were significantly higher in comparison with control children. Posttest mathematics scores of second‐grade children in the intervention condition were significantly lower in comparison with control children. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention program was successfully implemented and the lessons contributed to the academic outcomes of third‐grade children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/josh.12259

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mullender-Wijnsma et al. [45] found no significant difference between the overall academic performance of children receiving active academic lessons and those receiving regular academic lessons (p > 0.05).

    “The study conducted by Mullender-Wijnsma et al. [45] found no significant difference between the overall academic performance of children receiving active academic lessons and those receiving regular academic lessons (p > 0.05).”
  • Mullender-Wijnsma et al. [45] found active academic lessons had a significant (p < 0.01), negative effect on second-grade mathematics scores compared with regular academic lessons.

    “and a significant (p < 0.01), negative effect on mathematics scores compared with those receiving regular academic lessons.”
  • Mullender-Wijnsma et al. [45] found third-grade (8-9 years) children receiving active academic lessons scored significantly (p < 0.01) higher than those receiving regular academic lessons for mathematics and reading performance.

    “Interestingly, the third-grade (8–9 years) children receiving active academic lessons scored significantly (p < 0.01) higher than those receiving regular academic lessons for mathematics and reading performance.”
  • Mullender-Wijnsma et al. [45] found active academic lessons had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on second-grade (7-8 years) students' reading scores.

    “In contrast, the active academic lessons had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on second-grade (7–8 years) students’ reading scores”
  • Mullender-Wijnsma et al. [45] reported a significant interaction between grade and reading and mathematics performance.

    “However, a significant interaction between grade and reading and mathematics performance was reported.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mullender‐Wijnsma, M. J., Hartman, E., de Greeff, J. W., Bosker, R. J., Doolaard, S., & Visscher, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences Antonius Deusinglaan 1 9713 AV Groningen the Netherlands
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-15
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
365-371
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2156773547
Cited by
160
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
physical activity in the classroom, academic performance, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, elementary school students, second grade, third grade, mathematics achievement, reading achievement, program implementation, on-task behavior, heart rate monitoring, active learning
MeSH terms
Achievement, Child, Child Behavior, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, School Health Services, Program Evaluation, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review