CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to acrylamide in a nationally representative sample of the US population aged 6 years and older

Martínez Steele, Eurídice, Buckley, Jessie P., Monteiro, Carlos Augusto·2023·Preventive Medicine
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107598
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption has been associated with cardiovascular disease and cancer. Acrylamide is a probable human carcinogen commonly found in foods that are processed at high temperatures. The aim of this study was to examine the association between dietary energy contribution of UPF and acrylamide exposure, in the US. Among the 4418 participants from cross-sectional 2013-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, aged 6+ years, with hemoglobin biomarkers of acrylamide exposure, 3959 that completed the first 24-h dietary recall and had information on all covariates were included in the study. UPF were identified based on the Nova classification system, a four-group food classification based on the extent and purpose of industrial food processing. Linear regression was used to compare average acrylamide and glycidamide hemoglobin (HbAA+HbGA) concentrations across quintiles of daily energy contribution of UPF. Adjusted geometric means of acrylamide and glycidamide hemoglobin concentrations increased monotonically from the lowest to the highest quintile of UPF consumption in the overall population. Compared to the lowest quintile, the highest quintile had 9.1% higher levels of HbAA+HbGA (94.1 vs. 86.3 pmol/g Hb). These positive associations were statistically significant among males and in the young adult population and were largely driven by UPF which are known potential sources of acrylamide. The main effects remained unchanged when excluding curre…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107598

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UPF intake was associated with elevated circulating concentrations of acrylamide biomarkers in the USA and industrial trans-fatty acids in Europe.

    “UPF intake was associated with elevated circulating concentrations of acrylamide biomarkers in the USA 69 and industrial trans-fatty acids in Europe.70”

    From Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [69]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Askari, 2020, Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, Int. J. Obes., 44, 2080, 10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z · DOI
  2. Bellicha, 2022, Dietary exposure to acrylamide and breast cancer risk: results from the NutriNet-Santé cohort, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 116, 911, 10.1093/ajcn/nqac167 · DOI
  3. Beslay, 2020, Ultra-processed food intake in association with BMI change and risk of overweight and obesity: a prospective analysis of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort, PLoS Med., 17, e1003256, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003256 · DOI
  4. Birlouez-Aragon, 2010, The health and technological implications of a better control of neoformed contaminants by the food industry, Pathol. Biol. (Paris), 58, 232, 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.09.015 · DOI
  5. Blanton, 2006, The USDA automated multiple-pass method accurately estimates group total energy and nutrient intake, J. Nutr., 136, 2594, 10.1093/jn/136.10.2594 · DOI
  6. Buckley, 2019, Ultra-processed food consumption and exposure to phthalates and bisphenols in the US National Health and nutrition examination survey, 2013-2014, Environ. Int., 131, 105057, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105057 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cheang, 2021, Association of acrylamide hemoglobin biomarkers with serum lipid levels in general US population: NHANES 2013-2016, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 214, 112111, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112111 · DOI
  8. Delpino, 2022, Ultra-processed food and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies, Int. J. Epidemiol., 51, 1120, 10.1093/ije/dyab247 · DOI
  9. Desquilbet, 2010, Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research, Stat. Med., 29, 1037, 10.1002/sim.3841 · DOI
  10. EFSA, 2012, Update on acrylamide levels in food from monitoring years 2007 to 2010, EFSA J., 10, 2938
  11. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), 2015, Scientific opinion on acrylamide in food, EFSA J., 13, 4104
  12. Exon, 2006, A review of the toxicology of acrylamide, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev., 9, 397, 10.1080/10937400600681430 · DOI
  13. Flores, 2019, Risk assessment of chemical substances of safety concern generated in processed meats, Food Sci. Human Wellness, 8, 244, 10.1016/j.fshw.2019.07.003 · DOI
  14. Gore, 2015, EDC-2: the Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals, Endocr. Rev., 36, E1, 10.1210/er.2015-1010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Halford, 2012, The acrylamide problem: a plant and agronomic science issue, J. Exp. Bot., 63, 2841, 10.1093/jxb/ers011 · DOI
  16. Halterman, 2016, Biotech potatoes in the 21st century: 20 years since the first biotech potato, Am. J. Potato Res., 93, 1, 10.1007/s12230-015-9485-1 · DOI
  17. Hameed, 2018, Applications of new breeding Technologies for Potato Improvement, Front. Plant Sci., 29, 925, 10.3389/fpls.2018.00925 · DOI
  18. Huang, 2018, Associations of hemoglobin biomarker levels of acrylamide and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among U.S. adults: national health and nutrition examination survey 2003-2006, Environ. Pollut., 238, 852, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.109 · DOI
  19. Huang, 2018, Association of acrylamide hemoglobin biomarkers with obesity, abdominal obesity and overweight in general US population: NHANES 2003-2006, Sci. Total Environ., 631–632, 589, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.338 · DOI
  20. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 1994, vol. 60, 389
  21. Mariotti, 2011, Patented techniques for acrylamide mitigation in high-temperature processed foods, Recent Pat. Food Nutr. Agric., 3, 158, 10.2174/2212798411103030158 · DOI
  22. Martinez Steele, 2016, Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 6, e009892, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Martínez Steele, 2020, Association between dietary contribution of ultra-processed foods and urinary concentrations of phthalates and bisphenol in a nationally representative sample of the US population aged 6 years and older, PLoS One, 15, e0236738, 10.1371/journal.pone.0236738 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Martinez Steele, 2022, Potential reductions in ultra-processed food consumption substantially improve population cardiometabolic-related dietary nutrient profiles in eight countries, Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis., S0939-4753, 00364
  25. Mesias, 2021, Effect of consumer's decisions on acrylamide exposure during the preparation of French fries. part 1: Frying conditions, Food Chem. Toxicol., 147, 111857, 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111857 · DOI
  26. Michalak, 2011, The effect of domestic preparation of some potato products on acrylamide content, Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 66, 307, 10.1007/s11130-011-0252-2 · DOI
  27. Moradi, 2021, Ultra-processed food consumption and adult diabetes risk: a systematic review and dose-response Meta-analysis, Nutrients., 13, 4410, 10.3390/nu13124410 · DOI
  28. Moshfegh, 2008, The USDA automated multiple-pass method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 88, 324, 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324 · DOI
  29. Pacyga, 2019, Dietary predictors of phthalate and bisphenol exposures in pregnant women, Adv. Nutr., 10.1093/advances/nmz029 · DOI
  30. Pagliai, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Br. J. Nutr., 125, 308, 10.1017/S0007114520002688 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Pedreschi, 2014, Current issues in dietary acrylamide: formation, mitigation and risk assessment, J. Sci. Food Agric., 94, 9, 10.1002/jsfa.6349 · DOI
  32. Prentice, 2011, Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers, Am. J. Epidemiol., 5, 591, 10.1093/aje/kwr140 · DOI
  33. Romaguera, 2021, Consumption of ultra-processed foods and drinks and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer, Clin. Nutr., 40, 1537, 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.033 · DOI
  34. Rumpler, 2008, Identifying sources of reporting error using measured food intake, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., 62, 544, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602742 · DOI
  35. Spivey, 2010, A matter of degrees: advancing our understanding of acrylamide, Environ. Health Perspect., 118, A160, 10.1289/ehp.118-a160 · DOI
  36. Srour, 2019, Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé), BMJ., 29, l1451, 10.1136/bmj.l1451 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Steele, 2023, Identifying and estimating Ultraprocessed food intake in the US NHANES according to the Nova classification system of food processing, J. Nutr., 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.09.001 · DOI
  38. Suksatan, 2021, Ultra-processed food consumption and adult mortality risk: a systematic review and dose-response Meta-analysis of 207,291 participants, Nutrients., 14, 174, 10.3390/nu14010174 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Tareke, 2002, Analysis of acrylamide, a carcinogen formed in heated foodstuffs, J. Agric. Food Chem., 50, 4998, 10.1021/jf020302f · DOI
  40. Virk-Baker, 2014, Dietary acrylamide and human cancer: a systematic review of literature, Nutr. Cancer, 66, 774, 10.1080/01635581.2014.916323 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2022, Ultra-processed foods consumption increases the risk of hypertension in adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis, Am. J. Hypertens., 35, 892, 10.1093/ajh/hpac069 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Zhang, 2018, Exposure to acrylamide and the risk of cardiovascular diseases in the National Health and nutrition examination survey 2003-2006, Environ. Int., 117, 154, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.047 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martínez Steele, E., Buckley, J. P., & Monteiro, C. A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
174
Pages
107598
ISSN
0091-7435
DOI
10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107598
Cited by
36
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (382369/2021–1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review