The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 1976-1980
Abstract
The extent of diversity in the diets of black and white adults (n = 11,658) aged 19 to 74 years was evaluated from 24-hour dietary recalls obtained in the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Each 24-hour recall was evaluated for the consumption of items from the dairy, meat, grain, fruit, and vegetable groups (Food Group Score). A second scoring method (Serving Score) evaluated every recall for consumption of at least two servings each from dairy, meat, fruit, and vegetable groups and four servings from the grain group. Only a third of the population surveyed reported consuming foods from all the food groups on the survey day; less than 3% reported consuming foods from all food groups in at least the recommended amount. Blacks scored lower on both types of diet diversity scores than whites. Both types of diversity scores showed a significant trend to increase with increasing income and level of education. Failure to consume any foods from the dairy, meat, grain, fruit, and vegetable groups was reported by 24%, 6%, 5%, 46%, and 18%, respectively, of the population on the survey day. The proportion of the population consuming at least the desired number of servings from each of these food groups was 51%, 71%, 29%, 29%, 61%, respectively. The results emphasize the need for major public campaigns directed at increasing the diversity of US diets. Special target groups include minorities and those with limited income and formal education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS
BLOCK, G. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331 · Cited by 823
Self-citation
Cited by
Indexes of Overall Diet Quality
KANT, A. K. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00217-9 · Cited by 650
Self-citationHatløy, A., Torheim, L., & Oshaug, A. (1998) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600662 · Cited by 555
DIETARY DIVERSITY AS A FOOD SECURITY INDICATOR
Hoddinott, J. F., Yohannes, Y., Hoddinott, J., & Yohannes, Y. (2002) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.15972 · Cited by 451
Fruit and vegetable access in four low-income food deserts communities in Minnesota
Hendrickson, D., Smith, C., & Eikenberry, N. (2006) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-006-9002-8 · Cited by 374
Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants
Torheim, L. E., Ouattara, F., Diarra, M. M., Thiam, F. D., Barikmo, I., Hatløy, A., & Oshaug, A. (2004) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601853 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Kant, A. K., Block, G., Schatzkin, A., Ziegler, R. G., & Nestle, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-12
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1526-1531
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W138178028
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 1976-1980. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)01428-0
- The paper
- Kant, A. K., Block, G., Schatzkin, A., Ziegler, R. G., & Nestle, M. (1991). Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 1976-1980. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)01428-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.