The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall
Abstract
The validity of the 24-hour recall was studied with a comparison of recalled and observed food and nutrient intake for 140 subjects, 84 males (60%) and 56 females (40%), 15 to 57 years old. The observation was carried out during 1 day by recording the amounts of foods selected by the subjects at four meals. The following day, 24-hour recalls were obtained. The results showed that some food items eaten were omitted in the recall, the extremes being 4% of times eaten for fish and 50% for cooked vegetables. In addition, some food items not actually eaten were added in the recall, the additions ranging from 2% of times recalled for bread to 29% for sugar. The difference between mean recalled and observed nutrient intake was between -6% and 11%, except for sucrose (-20%) and vitamin C (-16%). The product-moment correlation coefficient between observed and recalled nutrient intake was in the range of 0.58 to 0.74. Women achieved somewhat more accurate results than men, and the recall results in the 35 to 44 age group were the most valid. It was concluded that validity is unsatisfactory on the individual level and satisfactory on the group level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS
BLOCK, G. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331 · Cited by 823
Cited by
A Low-Carbohydrate as Compared with a Low-Fat Diet in Severe Obesity
Samaha, F. F., Iqbal, N., Seshadri, P., Chicano, K. L., Daily, D. A., McGrory, J., Williams, T., Williams, M., Gracely, E. J., & Stern, L. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022637 · Cited by 1,267
Shay, C. M., Ning, H., Allen, N. B., Carnethon, M. R., Chiuve, S. E., Greenlund, K. J., Daviglus, M. L., & Lloyd-Jones, D. M. (2012) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.111.035733 · Cited by 368
Greenberg, I., Stampfer, M. J., Schwarzfuchs, D., Shai, I., & for the DIRECT Group (2009) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2009.10719767 · Cited by 193
Seshadri, P., Iqbal, N., Stern, L., Williams, M., Chicano, K. L., Daily, D. A., McGrory, J., Gracely, E. J., Rader, D. J., & Samaha, F. F. (2004) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.009 · Cited by 169
Accuracy in the estimation of food servings against the portions in food photographs
Ovaskainen, M.-L., Paturi, M., Reinivuo, H., Hannila, M.-L., Sinkko, H., Lehtisalo, J., Pynnönen-Polari, O., & Männistö, S. (2008) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602758 · Cited by 137
Elder, J. P., Ayala, G. X., Campbell, N. R., Slymen, D., Lopez-Madurga, E. T., Engelberg, M., & Baquero, B. (2005) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.1.49 · Cited by 119
Effect of weight loss on menstrual function in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome
Ornstein, R. M., Copperman, N. M., & Jacobson, M. S. (2011) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2011.01.002 · Cited by 82
Marzouk, T. M., & Sayed Ahmed, W. A. (2015) · Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.01.002 · Cited by 73
Day-to-day variation in energy and nutrient intake: evidence of individuality in eating behaviour?
Tarasuk, V., & Beaton, G. H. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90209-o · Cited by 55
Zadeh, M. H., Zamaninour, N., Ansar, H., Kabir, A., Pazouki, A., & Farsani, G. M. (2021) · Sao Paulo Medical Journal · doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2021.00065.r1.1504221 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Karvetti, R.-L., & Knuts, L.-R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1437-1442
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W198001911
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
