CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 199Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving long-term weight loss: Pushing the limits of treatment

Open access
Brownell, Kelly D., Jeffery, Robert W.·1987·Behavior Therapy
DOI 10.1016/s0005-7894(87)80004-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper adopts an aggressive stance on short-term and long-term weight losses produced by treatment of obesity. For many years the behavior therapy field has settled for small weight losses. This has resulted in part from a focus on “maintenance,” which implies something worth maintaining. Complacency has occurred because of the contest mentality underlying the design of parametric studies which compare behavior therapy to various alternatives and find behavior therapy to be the “treatment of choice.” It is not surprising that behavior therapy emerges the victor in these contests, given that the comparison groups are pseudotreatments such as nondirective group therapy rather than the widely used forms of dieting (e.g., Weight Watchers, Overeaters Anonymous, self-imposed diets). There is renewed cause for hope, however. The most recent generation of behavioral programs can produce substantial weight losses, apparently because programs are both longer and better. This paper proposes specific methods for testing the limits of treatment for obesity, in hopes that greater initial losses will be accompanied by more effective approaches to maintenance. In addition, we propose that more attention be focused on matching individuals to treatments, so that professionals serve a dual role of providing their treatment to those who are best suited and referring others elsewhere.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7894(87)80004-7

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Klesges, 1984, Personality and obesity: Global versus specific measures?, Behavioral Assessment, 6, 347
  2. Lindner, 1976, Multidisciplinary approach to obesity using fasting modified by protein-sparing therapy, Obesity/Bariatric Medicine, 5, 198
  3. Rosenthal, 1981, A comparison of standard behavioral and relapse prevention weight reduction programs, Obesity/Bariatric Medicine, 10, 94
  4. Stern, 1980, Effect of caloric restriction and exercise on basal metabolism and thyroid homrone, Nutrition and Medicine, 1, 361

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Brownell, K. D., & Jeffery, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Brownell, Kelly D.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
353-374
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0005-7894(87)80004-7
OpenAlex
W2041906096
Cited by
198
References
80
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity treatment, weight loss, long-term weight maintenance, dieting, treatment matching, referral, behavioral weight loss program

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review