Cited by 228Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthBariatric Surgery and Outcomes

Year-long weight loss treatment for obese patients with type II diabetes: Does including an intermittent very-low-calorie diet improve outcome?

Wing, Rena R., Blair, Elaine, Marcus, Marsha, Epstein, Leonard H., Harvey, Jean·1994·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate a year-long behavioral weight control program, used with and without an intermittent very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) in the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus. Patients and methods Subjects (n = 93) were randomly assigned to 50-week treatment programs that used either a balanced low-calorie diet (LCD) of 1,000 to 1,000 kilocalories (kcal) per day throughout or included 2 12-week periods of a VLCD of 400 to 500 kcal per day alternating with the balanced LCD. Weight, glycemic control, blood pressure, and lipids were assessed at baseline, at the end of the year-long treatment, and at 2-year follow-up. Results Subjects in the VLCD program lost significantly more weight than did LCD subjects at the end of the 50-week program (14.2 kg versus 10.5 kg; P = 0.057) and remained off diabetes medication longer (P < 0.05). These benefits of the VLCD were due primarily to the first 12 weeks of the diet; the second diet maintained, but did not increase, these effects. Subjects in both groups experienced marked improvements in glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors over the year-long program, but attendance declined in the latter weeks of treatment and weight was regained. There was also marked recidivism in both groups in the year following treatment. Conclusions The intermittent VLCD improved weight loss and glycemic control, but these effects were quite modest and do not appear to justify the clinical use of an intermittent VLCD. Moreover, lengthening treatment to a full year did not prevent relapse. Thus, further research is needed to develop a successful approach to long-term weight control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90302-6

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wing, R. R., Blair, E., Marcus, M., Epstein, L. H., & Harvey, J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Wing, Rena R.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-10
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
354-362
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026654554
Cited by
228
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk029757-15)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 29757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, obesity, hypocaloric diet, weight loss, behavioral weight control, glycemic control, weight regain, relapse, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Energy Intake, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Time Factors, Weight Loss, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review