Cited by 605Writing and Handwriting EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsReading and Literacy Development

Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development

Graham, Steve, Harris, Karen R., Mason, Linda·2005·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.08.001

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alexander, 1997, Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces, Vol. 10, 213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Mason, L.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Graham, Steve
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
207-241
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131305728
Cited by
605
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 25
FWCI
58.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
self-regulated strategy development, struggling writers, writing self-efficacy, writing knowledge, writing strategies, peer support, third grade, minority students, low-income schools, writing workshop, persuasive essay, story writing, informative writing, writing planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review