CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 201Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived control as a mediator of family environment in etiological models of childhood anxiety

Open access
Chorpita, Bruce F., Brown, Timothy A., Barlow, David H.·1998·Behavior Therapy
DOI 10.1016/s0005-7894(98)80043-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Recent developments in cognitive and emotion theory emphasize the importance of cognitive dimensions related to control and helplessness. Drawing from evidence in the area of control and explanatory style, the present study used a cross-sectional design to evaluate structural models investigating the relation of perceived control and attribution to family environment, negative affect, and clinical disturbance. It was hypothesized that the anxiogenic and depressogenic influences of a controlling family environment on negative affect would be mediated by cognitive dimensions. A mixed clinical and nonclinical sample of 93 children and their families was assessed, and findings suggested superior fit for the model in which the dimension of perceived control mediated between family environment and negative affect. The findings are discussed with respect to models of the etiology of childhood anxiety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7894(98)80043-9

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kovacs, 1980, Rating scales to assess depression in preschool children, Acta Paedopsychiatry, 46, 305

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 201

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chorpita, B. F., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Chorpita, Bruce F.
ORCID
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
457-476
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0005-7894(98)80043-9
OpenAlex
W1989886401
Cited by
200
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
perceived control, family environment, childhood anxiety, negative affect, helplessness, attributional style, attribution, depression, causes of anxiety, mediation, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review