CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 194Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The cognitive-behavioural treatment of low self-esteem in psychotic patients: a pilot study

Hall, Pauline L, Tarrier, Nicholas·2003·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00013-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Low self esteem in individuals with a psychotic disorder is common and may be related to poorer clinical outcomes. However, there has been little research on devising treatment methods to improve self-esteem either generally or in psychotic patients in particular. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of a simple cognitive behavioural intervention to improve self esteem in psychotic patients who scored poorly on a self-esteem measure. This pilot study was a randomised control trial with a convenience sample of chronic psychotic inpatients. The cognitive behavioural self-esteem intervention, as an adjunct to treatment as usual (TAU), was compared to TAU alone in patients with psychosis. The individual self-esteem intervention as described by Tarrier (The use of coping strategies and self-regulation in the treatment of psychosis. (2001)) consisted of working with participants to elicit positive self-attributes and then identify specific behavioural examples to provide evidence of this attribute. Emphasis was given to any consequential change in the patient's belief that they had the attribute. The results indicated that this cognitive behavioural treatment for self-esteem used as an adjunct treatment in psychosis, resulted in clinical benefits in terms of increased self-esteem, decreased psychotic symptomatology and improved social functioning. These benefits were largely maintained at 3-month follow-up.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00013-x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 194

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hall, P. L., & Tarrier, N.
Affiliations
  • Trafford General Hospital (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Tarrier, Nicholas
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
317-332
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00013-x
OpenAlex
W2161178571
Cited by
194
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
low self-esteem, psychosis, cognitive-behavioural intervention, adjunctive therapy, self-regulation, coping strategies, psychotic symptoms, social functioning, maintenance of treatment effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychotic Disorders, Self Concept, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review