Cited by 226Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatrySuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Cognitive approach to depression and suicidal thinking in psychosis: 2. Testing the validity of a social ranking model

Open access
Iqbal, Zaffer, Birchwood, Max, Chadwick, Paul, Trower, Peter·2000·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In paper I we reported that depression in the acute stage remitted in line with the psychosis and that 36% of patients developed post-psychotic depression (PPD). AIMS: We apply our cognitive framework to PPD and chart the appraisal of self and psychosis and their link with the later emergence of PPD. METHOD: Patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia (n=105) were followed up over 12 months following the acute episode, taking measures of depression, working self-concept, cognitive vulnerability, insight and appraisals of psychosis. RESULTS: Before developing PPD, these patients felt greater loss, humiliation and entrapment by their illness than those who relapsed or did not become depressed, and were more likely to see their future selves in 'lower status' roles. Upon becoming depressed, participants developed greater insight, lower self-esteem and a worsening of their appraisals of psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Depression in psychosis arises from the individual's appraisal of psychosis and its implications for his/her perceived social identity, position and 'group fit'. Patients developing PPD feel forced to accept a subordinate role without opportunity for escape. Implications for treatment are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.177.6.522

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinically significant changes in depression can occur in the context of psychosis in the absence of marked changes in positive and negative symptoms.

    “The finding that clinically significant changes in depression can occur in the context of psychosis in the absence of marked changes in positive and negative symptoms is consistent with previous research evidence suggesting that 'post-psychotic' depression emerges independently of positive symptom severity, relapse and negative symptoms (Birchwood et al., 2000; Iqbal et al., 2000).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for depression following psychosis: An examination of clinically significant change (2015) · cites this paper as Iqbal et al., 2000

    The “Experience of psychosis” section reports that the post-psychotic depression group did not experience the most relapse, supporting the distinction between depression and relapse. The paper’s passages do not establish that depression emerges independently of positive-symptom severity or negative symptoms; they do not report the relevant symptom comparisons. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Siris, S. G. Siris, S. G. (1995) (1995) Depression and schizophrenia. In Depression and schizophrenia. In Schizophrenia Schizophrenia (eds S. R. Hirsch & D. R.Weinberger), (eds S. R. Hirsch & D. R.Weinberger), pp. 128^145. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 128^145. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iqbal, Z., Birchwood, M., Chadwick, P., & Trower, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Birchwood, Max
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-12
Volume
177
Issue
6
Pages
522-528
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2027572551
Cited by
226
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
psychosis, schizophrenia, suicidal ideation, self-concept, self-esteem, insight, social identity, relapse, cognitive vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Suicide, Thinking, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review