The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment: a replication and extension of a cross-lagged panel analysis
Abstract
Reducing maladaptive cognitions is hypothesized to constitute an active therapeutic process in multidisciplinary pain programs featuring cognitive-behavioral interventions. A cross-lagged panel design was used to determine whether: a) early-treatment cognitive changes predicted late-treatment pain, interference, activity and mood changes, but not vice versa; b) three cognitive factors made unique contributions to outcome; c) substantial cognitive changes preceded substantial improvements in outcome. Sixty-five chronic pain patients, participating in a 4-week multidisciplinary program, completed measures of pain helplessness, catastrophizing, pain-related anxiety (process factors), pain severity, interference, activity level and depression (outcomes) at pre-, mid- and posttreatment. Results showed that early-treatment reductions in pain helplessness predicted late-treatment decreases in pain and interference, but not vice versa, and that early-treatment reductions in catastrophizing and pain-related anxiety predicted late-treatment improvements in pain severity, but not vice versa. Findings suggested that the three process factors predicted improvements mostly in common. However, little evidence was found that large early-treatment reductions in process variables preceded extensive improvements in pain. Findings replicate those of a recent report regarding cross-lagged effects, and offer support that cognitive changes may indeed influence late-treatment changes in outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In fact, relatively few treatment outcome studies have undertaken to measure and analyse possible mediators 50, 51, 57 or changes processes 4-6, 19, 20, 45, 46 in chronic pain trials.”
From The Mediating Role of Acceptance in Multidisciplinary Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“A large number of psychological variables have been identified as potential CBT process variables, including pain beliefs and perceived control over pain, 19, 20, 50 social support, 42, 43 coping, 19, 20 self-efficacy, 50 helplessness, 4-6 affective distress, and catastrophizing. 4, 6, 45, 46, 50, 52”
From The Mediating Role of Acceptance in Multidisciplinary Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Previous investigations examining potential process variables in CBT approaches for chronic pain have focused largely on pain beliefs and perceived control over pain, 19, 20, 50 social support, 42, 43 coping, 19, 20 self-efficacy, 50 helplessness, 4-6 affective distress, and catastrophizing. 4, 6, 45, 46, 50, 52”
From The Mediating Role of Acceptance in Multidisciplinary Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain (2015) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Recent longitudinal studies, done in the context of ongoing treatment programs, have shown that decreases in catastrophizing that occur early in treatment predict decreases in pain and pain-related outcomes later in treatment.14,15”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5 · Cited by 11,696
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)
Kerns, R. D., Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1985) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1 · Cited by 2,128
A component analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatment for depression.
Jacobson, N. S., Dobson, K. S., Truax, P. A., Addis, M. E., Koerner, K., Gollan, J. K., Gortner, E., & Prince, S. E. (1996) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.64.2.295 · Cited by 1,413
Causal Analysis with Panel Data
Finkel, S. E. (1995) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983594 · Cited by 1,369
Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception--I.
Lethem, J., Slade, P. D., Troup, J. D. G., & Bentley, G. (1983) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(83)90009-8 · Cited by 1,327
Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review.
Flor, H., Fydrich, T., & Turk, D. C. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90145-2 · Cited by 1,227
Causal Analysis With Panel Data
Finkel, S. E. (2020) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781526421036825836 · Cited by 1,080
Pain and Behavioral Medicine: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective
Turk, D., Meichenbaum, D. H., Genest, M., & Berntzen, D. (1984) · Scandinavian Journal of Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506078409455719 · Cited by 977
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions.
Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Peters, M. L., Fuchs, P. N., & Turk, D. C. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581 · Cited by 3,392
Pain catastrophizing: a critical review.
Quartana, P. J., Campbell, C. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2009) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.09.34 · Cited by 1,405
The role of psychosocial processes in the development and maintenance of chronic pain
Edwards, R. R., Dworkin, R. H., Sullivan, M. D., Turk, D. C., & Wasan, A. D. (2016) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.01.001 · Cited by 954
Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science
Keefe, F. J., Rumble, M. E., Scipio, C. D., Giordano, L. A., & Perri, L. M. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.576 · Cited by 954
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, J. W., Glenn, B., Bruehl, S., Harden, R. N., & Lofland, K.
- Affiliations
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burns, J.W.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1163-1182
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033409514
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain program, cognitive behavioral therapy, pain catastrophizing, pain-related anxiety, maladaptive cognitions, pain interference, depression, pain intensity, treatment outcomes, replication
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Cognition Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Regression Analysis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
