Cited by 61Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Pathways to fear in spider phobic children

Merckelbach, Harald, Muris, Peter, Schouten, Erik·1996·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Twenty-two children with spider phobia were interviewed about the origins of their fear. More specifically, children were asked about conditioning events, modeling experiences, and negative information transmission. To evaluate the reliability of the information provided by the children, parents were independently interviewed about the origins of their children's phobias. While 46% of the children claimed to have always been afraid, 41% ascribed the onset of their fear to aversive conditioning events. The large majority of these events were confirmed by parents. These findings cast doubts on a strong version of the non-associative account of spider phobia, i.e. the idea that spider phobia is acquired in the complete absence of learning experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00052-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the research that has examined pathways to fear has primarily relied upon non-clinical samples.

    “Much of the research (Field & Storksen-Coulson, 2007; Merckelbach et al., 1996; Muris & Field, 2010; Ollendick & King, 1991) that has examined these pathways to fear have primarily relied upon non-clinical samples, providing insight into the nature of the development of normative childhood fears.”
  • Merckelbach et al. (1996) found frequencies of child/parent endorsement for pathways: 40.9/36.4% direct, 17.4/17.4% vicarious/modelling, 4.5/0% informational/instructional, and 45.5/54.4% no pathway.

    “The frequency of child/parent endorsement for each of the pathways were: 40.9/36.4% for the direct pathway, 17.4/17.4% for the vicarious/modelling pathway, 4.5/0% for the informational/ instructional pathway, and 45.5/54.4% whom reported no pathway ( ' always been afraid ' ), respectively.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merckelbach, H., Muris, P., & Schouten, E.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
34
Issue
11-12
Pages
935-938
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113966855
Cited by
61
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
spider phobia, childhood phobia, fear acquisition, aversive conditioning, modeling, parent-child agreement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Animals, Association Learning, Child, Conditioning, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Personality Assessment, Phobic Disorders, Spiders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review