Cited by 52Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

The etiology of childhood dog phobia

King, Neville J., Clowes-Hollins, Viv, Ollendick, Thomas H.·1997·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

This study evaluated Rachman's theory of fear acquisition in a sample of 30 children with dog phobia. The children were on the waiting list of a university-based clinic. Parents were asked to indicate the most influential factor in the onset of their child's dog phobia. Nearly all parents were able to attribute their child's phobia to one of the fear pathways: direct conditioning, modelling or transmission of information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00067-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • King et al. (1997) found that half of parents (53.34%) endorsed modelling as the most influential to the development of their child's fear, followed by direct conditioning (26.7%), information/instruction (6.7%), and unknown origins (13.34%).

    “By contrast, another study including clinical children (1 -12 years, n = 30) with dog phobia (King et al., 1997), found that half of parents ( n = 16, 53.34%) endorsed modelling as the most in fl uential to the development of their child ' s fear, followed by a direct conditioning experience ( n = 8, 26.7%), and fi nally the information/instruction pathway ( n = 2, 6.7%).”
  • Findings from studies to date may suggest that the information/instruction pathway may be more implicated in the development of normative childhood fears than in children with clinical phobias.

    “Taken together, fi ndings from studies to date may suggest that the information/instruction pathway may be more implicated in the development of normative childhood fears than in children with clinical phobias (King et al., 1997).”
  • The Pathways to Fear Survey is a valuable tool in examining the origins of children's fears.

    “increasing evidence suggests that the Pathways to Fear Survey (Doogan & Thomas, 1992; King et al., 1997; Muris et al., 1997; Ollendick & King, 1991) is a valuable tool in examining the origins of children ' s fears”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, N. J., Clowes-Hollins, V., & Ollendick, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
King, Neville J.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
77
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980354383
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
dog phobia, childhood phobia, etiology, fear acquisition, modeling, information transmission, parental attributions
MeSH terms
Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Dogs, Fear, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychological Theory, Sampling Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review