Cited by 152Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismAnimal Genetics and ReproductionCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

ahr null alleles: distinctive or different?

Lahvis, Garet P, Bradfield, Christopher A·1998·Biochemical Pharmacology

Abstract

Two independent laboratories have generated Ahr "null" or "knockout" mice that share some common characteristics but also have distinct phenotypes. In this Commentary, we will discuss our view of the candidate variables that might account for these differences. More importantly, we hope that this discussion can identify important parameters to be assessed by investigators in the process of characterizing their own modified loci. The variables that we have considered include the possibility that different targeting strategies can result in altered products with unsuspected function or that the targeting event itself can alter the function of neighboring genes. Further, genetic background can have an important influence on phenotype, and differences in genome can be introduced during derivation by the type of embryonic stem cells used and by the random segregation of parental genes in the F2 generation of line propagation. In addition, phenotype may be acutely sensitive to environmental variables, such as pathogen and chemical exposure and stress introduced by crowding and disease. Finally, we discuss approaches to resolving differences between null mice and propose a partial solution, the institution of a repository for detailed information on targeted alleles that may not typically be allowed in today's "fast paced" scientific publications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-2952(98)00134-8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite initial inconsistent reports, the three Ahr null alleles produce quite similar phenotypes, with variation attributable to genetic background, environmental variables, or distinct laboratory emphasis.

    “Despite inconsistent reports in initial characterization of these three models, subsequent examination of these alleles has indicated that all phenotypes are in fact quite similar and the variation is due to genetic background, environmental variables, or distinct laboratory emphasis (Lahvis & Bradfield, 1998).”

    From Rodent Genetic Models of Ah Receptor Signaling (2021) · cites this paper as Lahvis & Bradfield, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lahvis, G. P., & Bradfield, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Bradfield, Christopher A
Venue
Biochemical Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
56
Issue
7
Pages
781-787
ISSN
0006-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131562982
Cited by
152
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p30ca007175-36)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA 07175)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES06883, R01ES006883)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
aryl hydrocarbon receptor, knockout mice, genetic background effects, embryonic stem cell derivation, phenotypic variability
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Crosses, Genetic, Models, Biological, Pedigree, Phenotype, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon, Mice, Knockout, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review