Cited by 168Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyCognitive Functions and Memory

Long live Proust: the odour-cued autobiographical memory bump

Chu, Simon, Downes, John Joseph·2000·Cognition

Abstract

The autobiographical memory bump is an increase in the frequency of reported autobiographical memories (AMs) from a particular age range, and has been reported by numerous investigators (for reviews, see Conway, M. A. & Rubin, D. C. (1993). The structure of autobiographical memory. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway & P. E. Morris, Theories of memory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum; Rubin, D. C., Rahhal, T. A. & Poon, L. W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best. Memory and Cognition, 26, 3-19) to occur in the second and third decades of life. Invariably, word labels have been used as AM cues but, given that a popular interpretation of the anecdotal 'Proust phenomenon' is that odours evoke AMs which are especially aged, we wondered if a different pattern in the AM bump might emerge if AMs were cued by odours rather than labels. Here we report an attempt to substantiate this aspect of the 'Proust phenomenon' by comparing the distributions of memories across the lifespan when cued by odour and label. Data showed that, in line with previous studies, the bump for label cues was found to peak between ages 11 and 25 years and was confirmed to be quadratic in form. In contrast, the odour-cued memory distribution peaked at 6-10 years and decreased linearly thereafter. In the earliest age interval, 6-10 years, the proportion of AMs retrieved in response to odour cues was significantly greater than that for the label cues. These results provide empirical su…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00065-2

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human research has identified that odor-evoked autobiographical memory tends to originate from an early period of life, typically within the first decade, whereas memories evoked by other sensory modalities are mainly located in the second and third decades of life.

    “First, it tends to originate from an early period of life, typically within the first decade, whereas memories evoked by other sensory modalities, such as visual or auditory cues, are mainly located in the second and third decades of life [1–5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, S., & Downes, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Downes, John Joseph
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-05
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
B41-B50
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112209384
Cited by
168
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autobiographical memory, olfactory cues, memory retrieval
MeSH terms
Aged, Autobiographies as Topic, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Odorants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review