Cited by 61Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

An in-depth review of the methods, findings, and theories associated with odor-evoked autobiographical memory

Open access
Hackländer, Ryan P. M., Janssen, Steve M. J., Bermeitinger, Christina·2019·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Over the past nearly 35 years, there has been sporadic interest in what has commonly come to be known as the Proust phenomenon, whereby autobiographical memories are retrieved and experienced differently when evoked by odors as compared with other types of cues, such as words, images or sounds. The purpose of this review is threefold. First, we provide a detailed analysis of the methods used to investigate Proust effects. Second, we review and analyze the various findings from the literature and determine what we feel to be the most important and stable findings. Third, we provide a series of previously postulated and new hypotheses that attempt to account for the various findings. Given the early stage of research, the current review aims to provide a measure of organization to the field, as well serve as a guide for how future investigations may address the topic. We conclude with the recommendation that research in this area shift its focus from establishing the phenomenon towards explaining its causes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-018-1545-3

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Childhood olfactory memory is generally associated with a more positive emotional valence compared to memories triggered by other senses.

    “Second, childhood olfactory memory is generally associated with a more positive emotional valence compared to those triggered by other senses [3,5–8].”

    From Positive early-life olfactory memory is rooted in the olfactory bulb and triggers large-scale changes beyond the olfactory system (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Pleasantness section (page not available) reports that odor-evoked autobiographical memories were more positive than memories evoked by other cues across the studies reviewed. It does not establish that this difference holds specifically for childhood memories. The Differential encoding bias section treats a childhood-based explanation as a hypothesis and notes evidence against it. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The sense of olfaction is unique in projecting directly to the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex, providing a close connection with the limbic system.

    “The sense of olfaction is unique in projecting directly to the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex, thus providing a close connection with the limbic system”

    From The scent of emotions: A systematic review of human intra‐ and interspecific chemical communication of emotions (2020) · cites this paper as Hackländer, Janssen, & Bermeitinger, 2019

    The Storage section (page unavailable) describes strong, close connections between odor-processing areas and the amygdala and hippocampus. It does not establish that olfaction uniquely projects directly to the amygdala or orbitofrontal cortex; searches for “orbitofrontal” and “limbic” found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Human research has identified that odor-evoked autobiographical memory tends to originate from an early period of life, typically within the first decade, whereas memories evoked by other sensory modalities are mainly located in the second and third decades of life.

    “First, it tends to originate from an early period of life, typically within the first decade, whereas memories evoked by other sensory modalities, such as visual or auditory cues, are mainly located in the second and third decades of life [1–5].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]38. Herz, R. S. (2005). The unique interaction between language and olfac- tory perception and cognition. In D. T. Rosen (Ed.), Trends in ex- perimental research (pp. 91-99). London, UK: Nova Publishing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hackländer, R. P. M., Janssen, S. M. J., & Bermeitinger, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hildesheim (DE)
  • University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (MY)
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2018-11-07
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
401-429
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2899814900
Cited by
61
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
autobiographical memory, olfactory cues, memory retrieval, sensory cueing, olfactory memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Association, Child, Cues, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Odorants, Sound, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review