CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel angiopoietin family protein, angiopoietin‐3

Kim, Injune, Kwak, Hee Jin, Ahn, Ji Eun, So, June-No, Liu, Mingzhu, Koh, Keum Nim, Koh, Gou Young·1999·FEBS Letters
DOI 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00008-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using homology‐based PCR, we have isolated cDNA encoding a novel member (491 amino acids) of the angiopoietin (Ang) family from human adult heart cDNA and have designated it angiopoietin‐3 (Ang3). The NH 2‐terminal and COOH‐terminal portions of Ang‐3 contain the characteristic coiled‐coil domain and fibrinogen‐like domain that are conserved in other known Angs. Ang3 has a highly hydrophobic region at the N‐terminus (∼21 amino acids) that is typical of a signal sequence for protein secretion. Ang3 mRNA is most abundant in adrenal gland, placenta, thyroid gland, heart and small intestine in human adult tissues. Additionally, Ang3 is a secretory protein, but is not a mitogen in endothelial cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00008-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81812-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.277.5322.55 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81813-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1006/jmcc.1997.0611 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.93.6.2576 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8998 · DOI
  7. 10.1096/fasebj.9.10.7615161 · DOI
  8. 10.1126/science.277.5322.48 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/14.11.4683 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1083/jcb.129.4.895 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/376070a0 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00276.x · DOI
  14. 10.1161/01.CIR.98.19.2081 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 58

Metadata

Authors
Kim, I., Kwak, H. J., Ahn, J. E., So, J.-N., Liu, M., Koh, K. N., & Koh, G. Y.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-01-29
Volume
443
Issue
3
Pages
353-356
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
DOI
10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00008-3
Cited by
58
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 11 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review