Cited by 179Cholesterol and Lipid MetabolismLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthLipid metabolism and disorders

Normalization of receptor binding of apolipoprotein E2. Evidence for modulation of the binding site conformation.

Open access
Innerarity, T L, Weisgraber, K H, Arnold, K S, Rall, S C, Mahley, R W·1984·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Apolipoprotein (apo-) E3, when combined with the phospholipid dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC), binds avidly to apo-B,E (low density lipoprotein) receptors on human fibroblasts. Apolipoprotein E2 isolated from type III hyperlipoproteinemic subjects, which differs from apo-E3 by the presence of cysteine instead of arginine at residue 158, possesses only about 1% of the receptor binding activity of apo-E3. Modification of apo-E2 with cysteamine, which converts the cysteine at position 158 to a positively charged lysine analogue, activates receptor binding approximately 13-fold. In the present experiments, thrombin was used to cleave apo-E2 into two fragments (Mr = 22,000 and Mr = 10,000). The larger fragment, which has been shown to possess the receptor binding domain, displayed binding activity up to 12-fold greater than intact apo-E2 or equivalent to apo-E2 treated with cysteamine. When the Mr = 22,000 fragment was modified with cysteamine and combined with DMPC, receptor binding was further enhanced, attaining the level of activity of normal apo-E3 X DMPC, a 100-fold increase over apo-E2 X DMPC binding. When the cysteamine modification was reversed by incubation with beta-mercaptoethanol, the Mr = 22,000 fragment retained most of its binding activity. However, when the same sample was tested 24 h later, the level of binding activity dropped significantly. The receptor binding of apo-E2-containing beta-very low density lipoproteins could also be activated by cysteamine t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)39866-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Innerarity, T. L., Weisgraber, K. H., Arnold, K. S., Rall, S. C., & Mahley, R. W.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-06
Volume
259
Issue
11
Pages
7261-7267
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1483795916
Cited by
179
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
27.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, LDL receptor, receptor binding, thrombin cleavage, receptor binding domain, conformational change, beta-VLDL, type III hyperlipoproteinemia, dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine, 2-mercaptoethanol
MeSH terms
Apolipoproteins, Apolipoproteins E, Arginine, Binding Sites, Cysteamine, Cysteine, Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Weight, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Cell Surface, Receptors, Lipoprotein, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review