Cited by 270DNA Repair MechanismsMitochondrial Function and PathologyDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

The Fidelity of Human DNA Polymerase γ with and without Exonucleolytic Proofreading and the p55 Accessory Subunit

Open access
Longley, Matthew J., Nguyen, Dinh, Kunkel, Thomas A., Copeland, William C.·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Mutations in human mitochondrial DNA influence aging, induce severe neuromuscular pathologies, cause maternally inherited metabolic diseases, and suppress apoptosis. Since the genetic stability of mitochondrial DNA depends on the accuracy of DNA polymerase gamma (pol gamma), we investigated the fidelity of DNA synthesis by human pol gamma. Comparison of the wild-type 140-kDa catalytic subunit to its exonuclease-deficient derivative indicates pol gamma has high base substitution fidelity that results from high nucleotide selectivity and exonucleolytic proofreading. pol gamma is also relatively accurate for single-base additions and deletions in non-iterated and short repetitive sequences. However, when copying homopolymeric sequences longer than four nucleotides, pol gamma has low frameshift fidelity and also generates base substitutions inferred to result from a primer dislocation mechanism. The ability of pol gamma both to make and to proofread dislocation intermediates is the first such evidence for a family A polymerase. Including the p55 accessory subunit, which confers processivity to the pol gamma catalytic subunit, decreases frameshift and base substitution fidelity. Kinetic analyses indicate that p55 promotes extension of mismatched termini to lower the fidelity. These data suggest that homopolymeric runs in mitochondrial DNA may be particularly prone to frameshift mutation in vivo due to replication errors by pol gamma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m105230200

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This explains why the insertion/deletion error rates of most polymerases increase with increasing repeat sequence length and why even proofreading-proficient replicative DNA polymerases with very high base substitution fidelity have low single base deletion fidelity when copying long homopolymeric sequences.

    “This explains why the insertion/ deletion error rates of most polymerases increase with increasing repeat sequence length and why even proofreading-proficient replicative DNA polymerases with very high base substitution fidelity have low single base deletion fidelity (e.g.Fig. 1, bottom) when copying long homopolymeric sequences (e.g.Refs.55 and 60 and references therein).”

    From DNA Replication Fidelity (2004) · cites this paper as [60]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The intrinsic 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity of Pol γ improves replication fidelity at least 20-fold.

    “The intrinsic 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity of Pol γ improves replication fidelity at least 20-fold (Longley et al., 2001).”
  • High fidelity of Pol γ is due to high nucleotide selectivity and exonucleolytic proofreading.

    “High fidelity is due to high nucleotide selectivity and exonucleolytic proofreading.”
  • The human catalytic subunit of Pol γ has high base substitution fidelity over short repeat sequences (< 3 nucleotides), as a misinsertion event only occurs approximately once in every 500,000 base pairs synthesized.

    “The human catalytic subunit of Pol γ has high base substitution fidelity over short repeat sequences (< 3 nucleotides), as a misinsertion event only occurs approximately once in every 500,000 base pairs synthesized (Longley et al., 2001).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Luft, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8731-8738
  2. Brown, W. M., George, M. J., and Wilson, A. C. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  3. Cortopassi, G. A., Shibata, D., Soong, N. W., and Arnheim, N. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7370 -7374
  4. Khrapko, K., Coller, H. A., Andre, P. C., Li, X. C., Hanekamp, J. S., and Thilly, W. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13798 -13803
  5. Sia, E. A., Butler, C. A., Dominska, M., Greenwell, P., Fox, T. D., and Petes, T. D. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 250 -255
  6. Longley, M. J., Prasad, R., Srivastava, D. K., Wilson, S. H., and Copeland, W. C. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12244 -12248
  7. Kaguni, L. S., and Olson, M. W. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6469 -6473
  8. Kunkel, T. A., Patel, S. S., and Johnson, K. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  9. Fan, L., Sanschagrin, P. C., Kaguni, L. S., and Kuhn, L. A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9527-9532

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longley, M. J., Nguyen, D., Kunkel, T. A., & Copeland, W. C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Copeland, William C.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
276
Issue
42
Pages
38555-38562
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998344938
Cited by
270
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
DNA polymerase gamma, mitochondrial DNA, replication fidelity, exonuclease proofreading, frameshift mutation, mismatch extension, nucleotide selectivity, mitochondrial DNA mutations
MeSH terms
DNA Polymerase gamma, Catalysis, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, DNA Repair, DNA, Mitochondrial, Humans, Kinetics, Mutation, Phenotype, Recombinant Proteins, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Mutagenesis, Frameshift Mutation, Gene Deletion, Base Pair Mismatch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review