Cited by 40Steroid Chemistry and BiochemistryMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionPolyamine Metabolism and Applications

Anaerobic Degradation of Choline

Open access
Hayward, Hugh R.·1960·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)64514-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayward, H. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hayward, Hugh R.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1960-12
Volume
235
Issue
12
Pages
3592-3596
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2406333640
Cited by
40
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
choline, anaerobic biodegradation, quaternary ammonium compounds, microbial metabolism
MeSH terms
Acetaldehyde, Choline, Fermentation, Vibrio, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review