Cited by 701Microbial metabolism and enzyme functionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionPolyamine Metabolism and Applications

Microbial conversion of choline to trimethylamine requires a glycyl radical enzyme

Open access
Craciun, Smaranda, Balskus, Emily P.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Choline and trimethylamine (TMA) are small molecules that play central roles in biological processes throughout all kingdoms of life. These ubiquitous metabolites are linked through a single biochemical transformation, the conversion of choline to TMA by anaerobic microorganisms. This metabolic activity, which contributes to methanogenesis and human disease, has been known for over a century but has eluded genetic and biochemical characterization. We have identified a gene cluster responsible for anaerobic choline degradation within the genome of a sulfate-reducing bacterium and verified its function using both a genetic knockout strategy and heterologous expression in Escherichia coli . Bioinformatics and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy revealed the involvement of a C–N bond cleaving glycyl radical enzyme in TMA production, which is unprecedented chemistry for this enzyme family. Our discovery provides the predictive capabilities needed to identify choline utilization clusters in numerous bacterial genomes, underscoring the importance and prevalence of this metabolic activity within the human microbiota and the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1215689109

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microbial choline TMA lyase is a glycyl radical enzyme complex of CutC and CutD encoded by adjacent genes.

    “identification of a microbial choline TMA lyase was reported as a unique glycyl radical employing enzyme complex comprised of a catalytic polypeptide, CutC, and an associated activating protein, CutD, encoded by adjacent genes within a gene cluster”
  • Gut microbes possess TMA lyases that cleave the C-N bond of choline/phosphatidylcholine and carnitine, releasing TMA.

    “While mammals do not have the enzyme, gut microbes have TMA lyases, which can cleave the C-N bond of these nutrients, releasing the TMA moiety as a waste product.”
  • Two distinct microbial enzyme systems have been identified in vitro that can produce TMA from either choline or carnitine.

    “Thus far, 2 distinct microbial enzyme systems have been identified in vitro that can produce TMA from either choline or carnitine as substrate (75,77).”
  • The choline-utilizing enzyme cutC and its partner cutD form a complex that selectively uses choline and releases TMA, producing choline TMA lyase activity.

    “The choline-utilizing enzyme cutC (catalytic polypeptide) and its partner cutD (regulatory polypeptide) make a complex that selectively uses choline as substrate and releases TMA (choline TMA lyase activity).”
  • The choline-specific TMA lyase uses an unusual glycyl radical enzyme intermediate.

    “Biochemical characterization of the microbial enzyme revealed a choline-specific TMA lyase that used an unusual glycyl radical enzyme intermediate.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craciun, S., & Balskus, E. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-11-14
Volume
109
Issue
52
Pages
21307-21312
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2043900297
Cited by
701
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • University of Oklahoma
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
glycyl radical enzymes, C–N bond cleavage, anaerobic metabolism, gene clusters, sulfate-reducing bacteria, methanogenesis, human microbiota, heterologous expression, electron spin resonance
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Choline, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Free Radicals, Genes, Bacterial, Multigene Family, Glycine, Humans, Lyases, Methylamines, Mutation, Computational Biology, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, Genetic Association Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review