Cited by 224Gut microbiota and healthPolyamine Metabolism and ApplicationsMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

Characterization and Detection of a Widely Distributed Gene Cluster That Predicts Anaerobic Choline Utilization by Human Gut Bacteria

Open access
Martínez-del Campo, Ana, Bodea, Smaranda, Hamer, Hilary A., Marks, Jonathan A., Haiser, Henry J., Turnbaugh, Peter J., Balskus, Emily P.·2015·mBio

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the human gut microbiota's effects on health and disease has been complicated by difficulties in linking metabolic functions associated with the gut community as a whole to individual microorganisms and activities. Anaerobic microbial choline metabolism, a disease-associated metabolic pathway, exemplifies this challenge, as the specific human gut microorganisms responsible for this transformation have not yet been clearly identified. In this study, we established the link between a bacterial gene cluster, the choline utilization (cut) cluster, and anaerobic choline metabolism in human gut isolates by combining transcriptional, biochemical, bioinformatic, and cultivation-based approaches. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis and in vitro biochemical characterization of two cut gene products linked the entire cluster to growth on choline and supported a model for this pathway. Analyses of sequenced bacterial genomes revealed that the cut cluster is present in many human gut bacteria, is predictive of choline utilization in sequenced isolates, and is widely but discontinuously distributed across multiple bacterial phyla. Given that bacterial phylogeny is a poor marker for choline utilization, we were prompted to develop a degenerate PCR-based method for detecting the key functional gene choline TMA-lyase (cutC) in genomic and metagenomic DNA. Using this tool, we found that new choline-metabolizing gut isolates universally possessed cutC. We also demonstrated that this gene is widespread in stool metagenomic data sets. Overall, this work represents a crucial step toward understanding anaerobic choline metabolism in the human gut microbiota and underscores the importance of examining this microbial community from a function-oriented perspective. IMPORTANCE: Anaerobic choline utilization is a bacterial metabolic activity that occurs in the human gut and is linked to multiple diseases. While bacterial genes responsible for choline fermentation (the cut gene cluster) have been recently identified, there has been no characterization of these genes in human gut isolates and microbial communities. In this work, we use multiple approaches to demonstrate that the pathway encoded by the cut genes is present and functional in a diverse range of human gut bacteria and is also widespread in stool metagenomes. We also developed a PCR-based strategy to detect a key functional gene (cutC) involved in this pathway and applied it to characterize newly isolated choline-utilizing strains. Both our analyses of the cut gene cluster and this molecular tool will aid efforts to further understand the role of choline metabolism in the human gut microbiota and its link to disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/mbio.00042-15

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [15]Hayward HR, Stadtman TC 1959 Anaerobic degradation of choline. I. Fermentation of choline by an anaerobic, cytochrome-producing bacterium, Vibrio cholinicus n. sp. J Bacteriol 78: 557– 561. 13852193 PMC290585
  2. [16]Bradbeer C 1965 The clostridial fermentations of choline and ethanolamine. 1. Preparation and properties of cell-free extracts. J Biol Chem 240: 4669– 4674. 5846987
  3. [33]Hayward HR, Stadtman TC 1960 Anaerobic degradation of choline. II. Preparation and properties of cell-free extracts of Vibrio cholinicus. J Biol Chem 235: 538– 543. 14400373
  4. [64]Brugère JF, Borrel G, Gaci N, Tottey W, O’Toole PW, Malpuech-Brugère C 2014 Proposed therapeutic use of archaea to prevent trimethylaminuria and cardiovascular disease. Gut Microbes 5: 5– 10. doi: 10.4161/gmic.26749. 24247281 PMC4049937 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [65]Rozen S, Skaletsky H 1999 Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 132: 365– 386. 10547847

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez-del Campo, A., Bodea, S., Hamer, H. A., Marks, J. A., Haiser, H. J., Turnbaugh, P. J., & Balskus, E. P.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Balskus, Emily P.
Venue
mBio
Published
2015-05
Volume
6
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2150-7511 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-2129
OpenAlex
W2096081710
Cited by
224
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • mBio (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Harvard University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
CutC, human gut microbiome, gut microbiota, trimethylamine N-oxide
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Bacteria, Choline, Multigene Family, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metagenome, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review