CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causal uncertainty and correction of judgments

Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Weary, Gifford·2003·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00028-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00028-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When people are unable to control and predict their environment, attributional biases are activated and strategies are implemented to restore feelings of control.

    “When people are unable to control and predict their environment, attributional biases are activated and strategies are implemented to restore feelings of control (Keinan, 2002;Underwood, 1996;Vaughn & Weary, 2003;Weary & Jacobson, 1997;Weary, Jacobson, Edwards, & Tobin, 2001).”

    From Searching for Control: Priming Randomness Increases the Evaluation of Ritual Efficacy (2014) · cites this paper as Vaughn & Weary, 2003

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Baron, 1986, The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berlyne, 1962, Uncertainty and epistemic curiosity, British Journal of Psychology, 53, 27, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1962.tb00811.x · DOI
  3. Cacioppo, 1982, The need for cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116, 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cacioppo, 1984, The efficient assessment of need for cognition, Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 · DOI · Paper page
  5. D’Agostino, 1992, Need for cognition and the correspondence bias, Social Cognition, 10, 151, 10.1521/soco.1992.10.2.151 · DOI
  6. DeSteno, 2000, Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397, 10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397 · DOI
  7. Edwards, 1998, Effects of causal uncertainty on the dispositional inference process, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 109, 10.1006/jesp.1997.1345 · DOI
  8. Edwards, 1998, Antecedents of causal uncertainty and perceived control: A prospective study, European Journal of Personality, 12, 135, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199803/04)12:2<135::AID-PER301>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  9. Edwards, 1998, Causal uncertainty: Factor structure and relation to the Big Five factors, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 451, 10.1177/0146167298245001 · DOI
  10. Festinger, 1954, A theory of social comparison processes, Human Relations, 7, 117, 10.1177/001872675400700202 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gilbert, 1997, Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617, 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Higgins, 1998, The aboutness principle: A pervasive influence on human inference, Social Cognition, 16, 173, 10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.173 · DOI
  13. Jacobson, 1999, Certainty and depression: The relationship between causal uncertainty, depressive predictive certainty, and depression, Social Cognition, 17, 19, 10.1521/soco.1999.17.1.19 · DOI
  14. Kagan, 1972, Motives and development, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 51, 10.1037/h0032356 · DOI
  15. Martin, 1990, Assimilation and contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27, 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.27 · DOI
  16. McGregor, 2001, Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being yourself, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.472 · DOI
  17. Petty, 2002, Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722, 10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722 · DOI
  18. Petty, 1993, Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137, 10.1006/jesp.1993.1007 · DOI
  19. Sommers, 2001, On the many impacts of inadmissible testimony: Selective compliance, need for cognition, and the overcorrection bias, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1368, 10.1177/01461672012710012 · DOI
  20. Sorrentino, 1988, Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 357, 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.357 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Stapel, 1998, The smell of bias: What instigates correction processes in social judgments?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 797, 10.1177/0146167298248002 · DOI
  22. Tversky, 1973, Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability, Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207, 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wanke, 1995, The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates, Acta Psychologica, 89, 83, 10.1016/0001-6918(93)E0072-A · DOI
  24. Weary, 1994, Individual differences in causal uncertainty, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 308, 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.308 · DOI
  25. Weary, 1997, Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 839, 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.839 · DOI
  26. Weary, 2001, Chronic and temporarily activated causal uncertainty beliefs and stereotype usage, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 206, 10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.206 · DOI
  27. Wegener, 1995, Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naı̈ve theories in corrections for perceived bias, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.36 · DOI
  28. Wegener, 1997, The flexible correction model: The role of naı̈ve theories of bias in bias correction, Vol. 29, 141
  29. West, 1996, Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions, Journal of Personality, 64, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00813.x · DOI
  30. Wilson, 2000, Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821, 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821 · DOI
  31. Weary, 2001, Chronic and temporary distinct expectancies as comparison standards: Automatic contrast in dispositional judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 365, 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.365 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vaughn, L. A., & Weary, G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
516-524
ISSN
0022-1031
DOI
10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00028-3
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review