The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulatory focus and temporal distance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A DYNAMIC THEORY OF PERSONALITY: SELECTED PAPERS
Lewin, K. (1936) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-193611000-00051 · Cited by 3,692
Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle
Higgins, E. T. (1998) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60381-0 · Cited by 3,511
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403 · Cited by 3,006
Liberman, N., & Yaacov Trope, B. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.5 · Cited by 2,366
Psychology: A Study of A Science
ED, K. S., & Albert, E. (1962) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-196210000-00015 · Cited by 1,917
Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting.
Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617 · Cited by 1,547
Roese, N. J. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133 · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationExploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times.
Buehler, R., Griffin, D. W., & Ross, M. G. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.3.366 · Cited by 1,105
The experience of regret: What, when, and why.
Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.379 · Cited by 1,098
Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
Singer, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165280 · Cited by 1,092
Cited by
Bringing the Frame Into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion.
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205 · Cited by 1,536
The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking
Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308316091 · Cited by 853
Self-citationAshford, S. J., Caza, B. B., & Reid, E. M. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001 · Cited by 582
How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus
Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x · Cited by 501
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212449362 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 563-576
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001117020
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulatory focus and temporal distance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00058-1
- The paper
- Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00058-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
