Cited by 501Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus

Förster, Jens, Higgins, E. Tory·2005·Psychological Science

Abstract

We propose a reciprocal relation between regulatory-focus systems and global versus local processing styles—specifically, that global processing fits a promotion focus on advancement, whereas local processing fits a prevention focus on security. In Study 1, participants were shown large letters made of small letters and decided if either of two specific letters appeared on the screen. Strength of promotion focus was positively correlated with speed of processing global letters and negatively correlated with speed of processing local letters, whereas the reverse was true for strength of prevention focus. In Study 2, participants first worked on a global or local task and later chose between two objects. Consistent with our fit proposal, participants who had performed the global task assigned a higher price to their chosen object if they had chosen it in apromotive, eager manner than if they had chosen it in a preventive, vigilant manner, whereas the reverse was true for participants who had performed the local task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a positive link between concrete construal (local processing style) and prevention regulatory focus (associated with avoidance motivation).

    “Indeed, there is a positive link between abstract construal (i.e., global processing style) and promotion regulatory focus (associated with approach motivation; Higgins, 1997), and a positive link between concrete construal (i.e., local processing style) and prevention regulatory focus (associated with avoidance motivation; Förster & Higgins, 2005).”

    From The mnemonic mover: Nostalgia regulates avoidance and approach motivation (2014) · cites this paper as Förster & Higgins, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Förster, J., & Higgins, E. T.
Affiliations
  • Constructor University (DE)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Förster, Jens
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2005-08
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
631-636
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2137160416
Cited by
501
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 36
FWCI
19.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
regulatory focus, promotion focus, prevention focus, visual search, processing speed, choice behavior
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Association Learning, Attention, Cognition, Discrimination Learning, Field Dependence-Independence, Goals, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perception, Psychoanalytic Theory, Reaction Time, Students, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review