Cited by 2,029RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryOrigins and Evolution of Life

Codon—anticodon pairing: The wobble hypothesis

Crick, F.H.C.·1966·Journal of Molecular Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2836(66)80022-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crick, F. H. C.
Affiliations
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
Corresponding author
Crick, F.H.C.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1966-08
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
548-555
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068694787
Cited by
2,029
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 47
FWCI
26.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Profiles in Science (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
Keywords
codon-anticodon pairing, genetic code degeneracy, codon, anticodon, triplet codons
MeSH terms
Adenine, Cytosine, Genetic Code, Guanine, Molecular Biology, Nucleosides, Uracil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review