Cited by 90Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer behavior in food and health

Consumer behavior and nutrition education: An integrative review

Glanz, Karen, Hewitt, Anne M., Rudd, Joel·1992·Journal of Nutrition Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3182(12)81244-1

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glanz, K., Hewitt, A. M., & Rudd, J.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Glanz, Karen
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
267-277
ISSN
0022-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994166495
Cited by
90
References
83
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Nutrition Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
consumer behavior, nutrition education, nutrition labeling, food shopping behavior, consumer information processing, social learning theory, community nutrition education, food purchasing decisions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review