Cited by 1,551Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutritional Studies and Diet

Why Americans Eat What They Do

GLANZ, KAREN, BASIL, MICHAEL, MAIBACH, EDWARD, GOLDBERG, JEANNE, SNYDER, DAN·1998·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Objective To examine the self-reported importance of taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control on personal dietary choices and whether these factors vary across demographic groups, are associated with lifestyle choices related to health (termed health lifestyle), and actually predict eating behavior.Design Data are based on responses to 2 self-administered cross-sectional surveys. The main outcomes measured were consumption of fruits and vegetables, fast foods, cheese, and breakfast cereals, which were determined on the basis of responses to questions about usual and recent consumption and a food diary.Subjects/setting Respondents were a national sample of 2,967 adults. Response rates were 71% to the first survey and 77% to the second survey (which was sent to people who completed the first survey).Statistical analyses Univariate analyses were used to describe importance ratings, bivariate analyses (correlations and t tests) were used to examine demographic and lifestyle differences on importance measures, and multivariate analyses (general linear models) were used to predict lifestyle cluster membership and food consumption.Results Respondents reported that taste is the most important influence on their food choices, followed by cost. Demographic and health lifestyle differences were evident across all 5 importance measures. The importance of nutrition and the importance of weight control were predicted best by subject's membership in a particular health lifestyle cluster. When eating behaviors were examined, demographic measures and membership in a health lifestyle cluster predicted consumption of fruits and vegetables, fast foods, cheese, and breakfast cereal. The importance placed on taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control also predicted types of foods consumed.Applications Our results suggest that nutritional concerns, per sc, are of less relevance to most people than taste and cost. One implication is that nutrition education programs should attempt to design and promote nutritious diets as being tasty and inexpensive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8223(98)00260-0

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GLANZ, K., BASIL, M., MAIBACH, E., GOLDBERG, J., & SNYDER, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Denver (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
GLANZ, KAREN
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-10
Volume
98
Issue
10
Pages
1118-1126
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047950288
Cited by
1,551
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 110 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 76
FWCI
16.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
food choice, food choice determinants, taste, food costs, convenience, weight management, health lifestyle, lifestyle clusters, demographic differences, fruit and vegetable intake, fast food consumption, cheese consumption, nutrition education
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Body Weight, Costs and Cost Analysis, Food, Food Preferences, Humans, Life Style, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taste, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review