Cited by 193Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Abuse and TraumaPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Childhood abuse, alexithymia and personality disorder

Berenbaum, Howard·1996·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

I examined the relationships among childhood abuse, alexithymia, and personality disorder. Participants were 60 adults who were receiving outpatient psychotherapy. Both the participants and their therapists used the Toronto Alexithymia Scale to provide independently information concerning the client's level of alexithymia. The therapists provided information concerning DSM-III-R personality disorder diagnoses, and participants completed portions of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised. Information concerning childhood abuse history was obtained from the therapists. As expected, childhood abuse, alexithymia, and personality disorder were all associated with each other. The abilities to identify and communicate emotions were differentially associated with childhood abuse and personality disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00225-5

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased rates of alexithymia in adulthood have been associated with negative childhood experiences such as physical or sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and poor family expressiveness.

    “increased rates of alexithymia in adulthood have been associated with a number of negative experiences in childhood, such as physical or sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and poor family expressiveness (Aust et al., 2013; Berenbaum, 1996; Kench and Irwin, 2000).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Berenbaum, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berenbaum, H.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Berenbaum, Howard
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
585-595
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972755269
Cited by
193
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
childhood abuse, alexithymia, personality disorders, emotion recognition, emotional communication, personality disorder diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Child Abuse, Communication, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Self-Assessment, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review