CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 267Regulation of Appetite and ObesityEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food

Epstein, Leonard H, Truesdale, Robin, Wojcik, Angela, Paluch, Rocco A, Raynor, Hollie A·2003·Physiology & Behavior
DOI 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00978-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Eating is influenced by both the hedonic preferences and reinforcing value of food. Incentive salience theory predicts these are separate influences. This study tested whether hedonics reliably change as a function of increasing the reinforcing value of food by deprivation in 17 non-obese, non-dietary restrained females. Baseline measures of hedonics for pleasant (chocolate milk), unpleasant (lemon juice) and neutral (water) tastes were determined under deprived conditions. Participants were then randomly assigned to fed or maintained in deprived conditions, and after food consumption, a second determination of hedonics was obtained, followed by assessing the reinforcing value of food. Hedonics was measured by subjective ratings and behavioral observations in a taste reactivity paradigm. Results showed food was more reinforcing for the deprived than the fed group, but no influences of group were observed for the subjective or objective hedonic measures. These results suggest that hedonics and the reinforcing value of food are separate processes in humans, and they may independently influence eating behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00978-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–267 of 267

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, L. H., Truesdale, R., Wojcik, A., Paluch, R. A., & Raynor, H. A.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Epstein, Leonard H
ORCID
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
221-227
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00978-2
OpenAlex
W2025315614
Cited by
267
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD025997, HD-25997)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food deprivation, incentive salience, taste reactivity, dietary habits, food reward, dietary restraint
MeSH terms
Adult, Eating, Female, Food, Food Deprivation, Food Preferences, Humans, Philosophy, Reinforcement, Psychology, Taste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review