The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
No project is an island: linking projects to history and context
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426 · cited 3×
“…compared to permanent organizations (Lundin and Söderholm, 1995), as effective tools in organizing product development (Clark and Wheelwright, 1992; Eisenhardt and Tabrizi, 1995; Lindkvist et al., 1998), as the natural work form in modern IT-companies (Barley and Kunda, 2000), and as the core…”
BackgroundKatz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x · Cited by 1,410
The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success
Baccarini, D. (1999) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/875697289903000405 · Cited by 1,136
Cited by
The impact of legitimacy-based motives on IS adoption success: An institutional theory perspective
Krell, K., Matook, S., & Rohde, F. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.02.006 · Cited by 102
Temporary organizing and permanent contexts
Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2020) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392120907629 · Cited by 75
Borman, M., & Janssen, M. (2013) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.012 · Cited by 56
Whyte, J., & Mottee, L. (2022) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.007 · Cited by 55
Bossink, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.063 · Cited by 42
Doing, being, becoming: a historical appraisal of the modalities of project-based learning
Hanney, R. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1421628 · Cited by 41
Moving goals and governance in megaprojects
Bourne, M., Bosch-Rekveldt, M., & Pesämaa, O. (2023) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102486 · Cited by 41
A routine dynamics lens on the stability-change dilemma in project-based organizations
Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A., & Vaagaasar, A. L. (2021) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/8756972820986660 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Engwall, M.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 789-808
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998149876
- Cited by
- 1,142
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 56.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
