The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Fear Arousal on Attitude Change: Recent Developments in Theory and Experimental Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior
Easterbrook, J. A. (1959) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0047707 · Cited by 3,090
Cited by
A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1
Rogers, R. W. (1975) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 · Cited by 6,805
Putting the fear back into fear appeals: the extended parallel process model
Witte, K. (1992) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759209376276 · Cited by 3,880
A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns
Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700506 · Cited by 3,216
Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change
Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9 · Cited by 2,342
The precaution adoption process.
Weinstein, N. D. (1988) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037//0278-6133.7.4.355 · Cited by 1,459
Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories
Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0039729 · Cited by 1,315
“…in which message recipients disengage from the message, avoid further exposure to the message, and/or derogate the message because it is too frightening (Higbee, 1969; Hovland et al., 1953; Janis, 1967, 1968; Janis & Feshbach, 1953; Janis & Leventhal , 1968; McGuire, 1968, 1969; Millman, 1968).”
BackgroundStalking the elusive “vividness” effect
Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.2.155 · Cited by 913
Avoidance of Information Technology Threats: A Theoretical Perspective1
Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650279 · Cited by 733
Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages
liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167292186002 · Cited by 619
Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167299259003 · Cited by 379
The Extended Parallel Process Model: Illuminating the Gaps in Research
Popova, L. (2012) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198111418108 · Cited by 361
Schwartz, S. H. (1970) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0029614 · Cited by 307
Ferrer, R. A., Green, P. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615576755 · Cited by 58
Intention to adopt services by AI avatar: A protection motivation theory perspective
Park, J., Yun, J., & Chang, W. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103929 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Janis, I. L.
- Venue
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1967
- Pages
- 166-224
- ISSN
- 0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1491771820
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 178.77
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
