Cited by 619Media Influence and HealthRisk Perception and ManagementBehavioral Health and Interventions

Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages

liberman, Akiva, Chaiken, Shelly·1992·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Subectsfor whom a health threat was relvant or irrelevant were recruited and matched on prior beliefs in the health threat. Following exposure to either a low- or a high-threat message, high-relvance subjects were less likely to believe in the threat. Consistent with earlier work, no evidence was found to suggest that defensive inattention to the messages mediated subjects' final beliefs. Instead, processing measures suggested that highrelevance subects processed threatening parts of both messages in a biased fashion. The relationship between biased judgment and biased processing is discussed, as are the difficulties in documenting the latter

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167292186002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Proximal defenses are threat-focused and push conscious death-related thoughts out of awareness, either through adaptive problem-solving or through distortions such as denying vulnerability and biased processing of threatening information.

    “Proximal defenses are threat-focused and function to push these thoughts out of consciousness, either by addressing them in adaptive ways or engaging in cognitive distortions. These entail either rational problem-solving responses that reduce actual risk or defensive responses such as the denial of vulnerability and biased processing of personally relevant threatening information (Croyle et al., 1”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
liberman, A., & Chaiken, S.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
1992-12
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
669-679
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1984798263
Cited by
619
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 28
FWCI
94.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
defensive processing, health messaging, health hazards, message relevance, belief revision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review