The DOI matches its Crossref record; 141 of the 141 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This training study provides further support for the strategy mediation theory of WM improvement (Dunning & Holmes, 2014; Peng & Fuchs, 2017), compared with the capacity theory (Engle & Kane, 2003).”
From Training-induced improvement in working memory tasks results from switching to efficient strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Engle & Kane, 2003
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
Baddeley, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2 · Cited by 7,359 · cited 1×
“As developed by Baddeley (1986, 1996, 2000), the working memory model now arguably emphasizes structure over function.”
BackgroundConflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315799438 · Cited by 6,761
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,902 · cited 1×
“This is a variant of a hypothesis popular in explaining the effects of aging on cognition called "age-related slowing" (Kail & Salthouse, 1994; Salthouse, 1996); it is also similar to views advocated by some theorists of intelligence (Jensen, 1982, 1998).”
Result(1983) · Cited by 5,041
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,726
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Conway, 1999, Is Spearman's g determined by speed or working memory capacity? Book review of Jensen on Intelligence-g-Factor, Psycoloquy, 10
- MacLeod, C. M., Dodd, M. D., Sheard, E.D., Wilson, D. E., & Bibi, U. (in press). In opposition to inhibition. In B. Ross, (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 43, Elsevier
- O'Reilly, 1997
- Oberauer, 1993, Die Koordination kognitiver Operationen. Eine Studie zum Zusammenhang von ‘working memory’ und Intelligenz [The coordination of cognitive operations. A study of the relationship of working memory and intelligence], Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 201, 57
- Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. Working memory capacity and the control ofattention. In R. W. Engle, G. Sedek, U. Hecker, & D. N. McIntosh (Eds.), Cognitivelimitations in aging and psychopathology: Attention, working memory, and executivefunctions. NY: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002
Functional opponency in working memory capacity predicts cognitive flexibility in problem solving.
Stockum, C. A. V. (2019) · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) · doi:10.18297/etd/3277
Nguyen, T. L. (2019) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)
Metadata
- Authors
- Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Venue
- Psychology of Learning and Motivation
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 145-199
- ISSN
- 0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131043924
- Cited by
- 1,104
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 35.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- working memory capacity, executive attention, cognitive control, Herzberg's two-factor theory, fluid intelligence, individual differences, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, conflict detection, individual differences in cognitive ability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
