Cited by 1,837Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial

H. J. Dargie·2001·The Lancet

Abstract

Background The beneficial effects of beta-blockers on long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction were shown before the introduction of thrombolysis and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Generally, the patients recruited to these trials were at low risk: few had heart failure, and none had measurements of left-ventricular function taken. We investigated the long-term efficacy of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction treated according to current evidence-based practice. Methods In a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 1959 patients with a proven acute myocardial infarction and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of Findings Although there was no difference between the carvedilol and placebo groups in the number of patients with the primary endpoint (340 [35%] vs 367 [37%], hazard ratio 0.92 [95% CI 0.80-1.07]), all-cause mortality alone was lower in the carvedilol group than in the placebo group (116 [12%] vs 151 [15%], 0.77 [0.60-0.98], p=0.03). Cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarctions, and all-cause mortality or non-fatal myocardial infarction were also lower on carvedilol than on placebo. Interpretation In patients treated long-term after an acute myocardial infarction complicated by left-ventricular systolic dysfunction, carvedilol reduced the frequency of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and recurrent, non-fatal myocardial infarcti…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04560-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dargie, H. J.
Affiliations
Western Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
H. J. Dargie
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
357
Issue
9266
Pages
1385-1390
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W21478844
Cited by
1,837
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 77
FWCI
61.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
carvedilol, beta-blockers, acute myocardial infarction, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, reinfarction, heart failure, ACE inhibitors, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Carvedilol, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carbazoles, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Propanolamines, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review