Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 598

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial

Open access
Aujesky, Drahomir, Roy, Pierre-Marie, Verschuren, Franck, Righini, Marc, Osterwalder, Joseph, Egloff, Michael, Renaud, Bertrand, Verhamme, Peter, Stone, Roslyn A, Legall, Catherine, Sanchez, Olivier, Pugh, Nathan A, N'gako, Alfred, Cornuz, Jacques, Hugli, Olivier, Beer, Hans-Jürg, Perrier, Arnaud, Fine, Michael J, Yealy, Donald M·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND Although practice guidelines recommend outpatient care for selected, haemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism, most treatment is presently inpatient based. We aimed to assess non-inferiority of outpatient care compared with inpatient care. METHODS We undertook an open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial at 19 emergency departments in Switzerland, France, Belgium, and the USA. We randomly assigned patients with acute, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and a low risk of death (pulmonary embolism severity index risk classes I or II) with a computer-generated randomisation sequence (blocks of 2-4) in a 1:1 ratio to initial outpatient (ie, discharged from hospital ≤24 h after randomisation) or inpatient treatment with subcutaneous enoxaparin (≥5 days) followed by oral anticoagulation (≥90 days). The primary outcome was symptomatic, recurrent venous thromboembolism within 90 days; safety outcomes included major bleeding within 14 or 90 days and mortality within 90 days. We used a non-inferiority margin of 4% for a difference between inpatient and outpatient groups. We included all enrolled patients in the primary analysis, excluding those lost to follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00425542. FINDINGS Between February, 2007, and June, 2010, we enrolled 344 eligible patients. In the primary analysis, one (0·6%) of 171 outpatients developed recurrent venous thromboembolism within 90 days compared with none of 168 inpatients (95% upper confidence limit [UCL] 2·7%; p=0·011). Only one (0·6%) patient in each treatment group died within 90 days (95% UCL 2·1%; p=0·005), and two (1·2%) of 171 outpatients and no inpatients had major bleeding within 14 days (95% UCL 3·6%; p=0·031). By 90 days, three (1·8%) outpatients but no inpatients had developed major bleeding (95% UCL 4·5%; p=0·086). Mean length of stay was 0·5 days (SD 1·0) for outpatients and 3·9 days (SD 3·1) for inpatients. INTERPRETATION In selected low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism, outpatient care can safely and effectively be used in place of inpatient care. FUNDING Swiss National Science Foundation, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, and the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Sanofi-Aventis provided free drug supply in the participating European centres.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60824-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Levine, 1996, A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin administered primarily at home with unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital for proximal deep-vein thrombosis, N Engl J Med, 334, 677, 10.1056/NEJM199603143341101 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Koopman, 1996, Treatment of venous thrombosis with intravenous unfractionated heparin administered in the hospital as compared with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin administered at home. The Tasman Study Group, N Engl J Med, 334, 682, 10.1056/NEJM199603143341102 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Kearon, 2008, Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edn), Chest, 133, 454S, 10.1378/chest.08-0658 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2003, British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism, Thorax, 58, 470, 10.1136/thorax.58.6.470 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Snow, 2007, Management of venous thromboembolism: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians, Ann Intern Med, 146, 204, 10.7326/0003-4819-146-3-200702060-00149 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Torbicki, 2008, Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Eur Heart J, 29, 2276, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn310 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wells, 1998, Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection, Arch Intern Med, 158, 1809, 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1809 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kovacs, 2000, Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism with dalteparin, Thromb Haemost, 83, 209, 10.1055/s-0037-1613787 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Beer, 2003, Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe in a substantial proportion of patients, J Thromb Haemost, 1, 186, 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00005.x · DOI
  10. Siragusa, 2005, Home therapy for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in cancer patients, Ann Oncol, 16, iv136, 10.1093/annonc/mdi923 · DOI
  11. Wells, 2005, A randomized trial comparing 2 low-molecular-weight heparins for the outpatient treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, Arch Intern Med, 165, 733, 10.1001/archinte.165.7.733 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Olsson, 2006, Outpatient tinzaparin therapy in pulmonary embolism quantified with ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, Med Sci Monit, 12, PI9
  13. Ong, 2005, Management of pulmonary embolism in the home, Med J Aust, 183, 239, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07027.x · DOI
  14. Kovacs, 2010, Ambulatory management of pulmonary embolism: a pragmatic evaluation, J Thromb Haemost, 8, 2406, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03981.x · DOI
  15. Erkens, 2010, Safety of outpatient treatment in acute pulmonary embolism, J Thromb Haemost, 8, 2412, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04041.x · DOI
  16. Zondag, 2010, Outpatient treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the Hestia study, Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 116
  17. Davies, 2007, Early discharge of patients with pulmonary embolism: a two-phase observational study, Eur Respir J, 30, 708, 10.1183/09031936.00140506 · DOI
  18. Agterof, 2010, Out of hospital treatment of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a low NT-proBNP level, J Thromb Haemost, 8, 1235, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03831.x · DOI
  19. Otero, 2010, Home treatment in pulmonary embolism, Thromb Res, 126, e1, 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.09.026 · DOI
  20. Aujesky, 2006, Validation of a model to predict adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism, Eur Heart J, 27, 476, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi588 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Donze, 2008, Prospective validation of the pulmonary embolism severity index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism, Thromb Haemost, 100, 943, 10.1160/TH08-05-0285 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Fraga, 2010, The interrater reliability of the pulmonary embolism severity index, Thromb Haemost, 104, 1258, 10.1160/TH10-07-0426 · DOI
  23. Buller, 2003, Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism, N Engl J Med, 349, 1695, 10.1056/NEJMoa035451 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Le Gal, 2006, A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients, Thromb Haemost, 95, 963, 10.1160/TH06-03-0158 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Buller, 2007, Idraparinux versus standard therapy for venous thromboembolic disease, N Engl J Med, 357, 1094, 10.1056/NEJMoa064247 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Schulman, 2005, Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients, J Thromb Haemost, 3, 692, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. Aujesky, 2007, Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism, J Intern Med, 261, 597, 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01785.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 1997, Low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of patients with venous thromboembolism, N Engl J Med, 337, 657, 10.1056/NEJM199709043371001 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Fiessinger, 2005, Ximelagatran vs low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: a randomized trial, JAMA, 293, 681, 10.1001/jama.293.6.681 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Schulman, 2009, Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism, N Engl J Med, 361, 2342, 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Chan, 2003, Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods, Stat Methods Med Res, 12, 37, 10.1191/0962280203sm314ra · DOI
  32. Rosendaal, 1993, A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy, Thromb Haemost, 69, 236, 10.1055/s-0038-1651587 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Janjua, 2008, Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism as outpatients or following early discharge. A systematic review, Thromb Haemost, 100, 756, 10.1160/TH08-05-0319 · DOI
  34. Squizzato, 2009, Outpatient treatment and early discharge of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a systematic review, Eur Respir J, 33, 1148, 10.1183/09031936.00133608 · DOI
  35. van Bladel, 2010, Out of hospital anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism is frequently practised but not perfect, Thromb Res, 126, 481, 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.019 · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2010.08.019
  36. Heit, 1999, Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based, cohort study, Arch Intern Med, 159, 445, 10.1001/archinte.159.5.445 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Aujesky, 2006, A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism, Arch Intern Med, 166, 169, 10.1001/archinte.166.2.169 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Merli, 2001, Subcutaneous enoxaparin once or twice daily compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolic disease, Ann Intern Med, 134, 191, 10.7326/0003-4819-134-3-200102060-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Buller, 2004, Fondaparinux or enoxaparin for the initial treatment of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis: a randomized trial, Ann Intern Med, 140, 867, 10.7326/0003-4819-140-11-200406010-00007 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 598

Metadata

Authors
Aujesky, D., Roy, P.-M., Verschuren, F., Righini, M., Osterwalder, J., Egloff, M., Renaud, B., Verhamme, P., Stone, R. A., Legall, C., Sanchez, O., Pugh, N. A., N'gako, A., Cornuz, J., Hugli, O., Beer, H.-J., Perrier, A., Fine, M. J., & Yealy, D. M.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
378
Issue
9785
Pages
41-48
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2102380178
Cited by
598
References
4
FWCI
40.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • Meso Scale Diagnostics
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (21-03, 3200B0-1121)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1R01HL085565-01A2)
  • Pfizer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60824-6
The paper
Aujesky, D., Roy, P.-M., Verschuren, F., Righini, M., Osterwalder, J., Egloff, M., Renaud, B., Verhamme, P., Stone, R. A., Legall, C., Sanchez, O., Pugh, N. A., N'gako, A., Cornuz, J., Hugli, O., Beer, H.-J., Perrier, A., Fine, M. J., & Yealy, D. M. (2011). Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60824-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.