CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 259Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth disparities and outcomesHealth, psychology, and well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Does happiness itself directly affect mortality? The prospective UK Million Women Study

Open access
Liu, Bette, Floud, Sarah, Pirie, Kirstin, Green, Jane, Peto, Richard, Beral, Valerie·2016·The Lancet
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01087-9PMC PMC5075047
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor health can cause unhappiness and poor health increases mortality. Previous reports of reduced mortality associated with happiness could be due to the increased mortality of people who are unhappy because of their poor health. Also, unhappiness might be associated with lifestyle factors that can affect mortality. We aimed to establish whether, after allowing for the poor health and lifestyle of people who are unhappy, any robust evidence remains that happiness or related subjective measures of wellbeing directly reduce mortality. METHODS: The Million Women Study is a prospective study of UK women recruited between 1996 and 2001 and followed electronically for cause-specific mortality. 3 years after recruitment, the baseline questionnaire for the present report asked women to self-rate their health, happiness, stress, feelings of control, and whether they felt relaxed. The main analyses were of mortality before Jan 1, 2012, from all causes, from ischaemic heart disease, and from cancer in women who did not have heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive lung disease, or cancer at the time they answered this baseline questionnaire. We used Cox regression, adjusted for baseline self-rated health and lifestyle factors, to calculate mortality rate ratios (RRs) comparing mortality in women who reported being unhappy (ie, happy sometimes, rarely, or never) with those who reported being happy most of the time. FINDINGS: Of 719,671 women in the main analyses (median age 59 years [IQR 55-63]), 39% (282,619) reported being happy most of the time, 44% (315,874) usually happy, and 17% (121,178) unhappy. During 10 years (SD 2) follow-up, 4% (31,531) of participants died. Self-rated poor health at baseline was strongly associated with unhappiness. But after adjustment for self-rated health, treatment for hypertension, diabetes, asthma, arthritis, depression, or anxiety, and several sociodemographic and lifestyle factors (including smoking, deprivation, and body-mass index), unhappiness was not associated with mortality from all causes (adjusted RR for unhappy vs happy most of the time 0·98, 95% CI 0·94-1·01), from ischaemic heart disease (0·97, 0·87-1·10), or from cancer (0·98, 0·93-1·02). Findings were similarly null for related measures such as stress or lack of control. INTERPRETATION: In middle-aged women, poor health can cause unhappiness. After allowing for this association and adjusting for potential confounders, happiness and related measures of wellbeing do not appear to have any direct effect on mortality. FUNDING: UK Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01087-9

Cites

32 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Correlates of being generally happy—relevance of personal and lifestyle characteristics at baseline Analysis for whole population (N=845 440), including women later excluded for life-threatening health disorders. *ORs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. OR=odds ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.
Figure 1 Correlates of being generally happy—relevance of personal and lifestyle characteristics at baseline Analysis for whole population (N=845 440), including women later excluded for life-threatening health disorders. *ORs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. OR=odds ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Correlates of being generally happy—relevance of various indices of health at baseline Analysis for whole population (N=845 440), including women later excluded for life-threatening health disorders. ORs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. OR=odds ratio.
Figure 2 Correlates of being generally happy—relevance of various indices of health at baseline Analysis for whole population (N=845 440), including women later excluded for life-threatening health disorders. ORs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. OR=odds ratio.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 RR of all-cause mortality by self-rated health and happiness Includes 719 671 women (31 531 deaths). Excludes women with cancer, heart disease, stroke, or chronic obstructive airways disease at baseline. RRs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. Women who reported being in good or excellent health and happy most of the time are the reference group (RR=1·0). RR=rate ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.
Figure 3 RR of all-cause mortality by self-rated health and happiness Includes 719 671 women (31 531 deaths). Excludes women with cancer, heart disease, stroke, or chronic obstructive airways disease at baseline. RRs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. Women who reported being in good or excellent health and happy most of the time are the reference group (RR=1·0). RR=rate ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Risk of ischaemic heart disease mortality and cancer mortality by happiness in women who rated their health as good or excellent at baseline Includes 550 737 women (1253 ischaemic heart disease deaths, 12 943 cancer deaths). Excludes women with cancer, heart disease, stroke, or chronic obstructive airways disease at baseline, and women who rated their health as poor or fair at baseline. RRs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. Women who reported being happy most of the time are the reference group (RR=1·0). RR=rate ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.
Figure 4 Risk of ischaemic heart disease mortality and cancer mortality by happiness in women who rated their health as good or excellent at baseline Includes 550 737 women (1253 ischaemic heart disease deaths, 12 943 cancer deaths). Excludes women with cancer, heart disease, stroke, or chronic obstructive airways disease at baseline, and women who rated their health as poor or fair at baseline. RRs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. Women who reported being happy most of the time are the reference group (RR=1·0). RR=rate ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 All-cause mortality by happiness and other measures of wellbeing in women who rated their health as good or excellent at baseline Includes 550 737 women (20 073 deaths). Excluding women with cancer, heart disease, stroke, or chronic obstructive airways disease at baseline and women who rated their health as poor or fair at baseline. RRs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. The referenced groups (RR=1·0) were women who reported being happy most of the time (A); in control most of the time (B); relaxed most of the time (C); and rarely or never stressed (D). g-s CIs that are not visible are smaller than the solid circle. RR=rate ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.
Figure 5 All-cause mortality by happiness and other measures of wellbeing in women who rated their health as good or excellent at baseline Includes 550 737 women (20 073 deaths). Excluding women with cancer, heart disease, stroke, or chronic obstructive airways disease at baseline and women who rated their health as poor or fair at baseline. RRs are adjusted for age, region, area deprivation, body-mass index, qualifications, strenuous exercise, smoking, alcohol, living with a partner, parity, participation in group activities, and sleep duration. The referenced groups (RR=1·0) were women who reported being happy most of the time (A); in control most of the time (B); relaxed most of the time (C); and rarely or never stressed (D). g-s CIs that are not visible are smaller than the solid circle. RR=rate ratio. g-s CI=group-specific confidence interval.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 259

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Liu, B., Floud, S., Pirie, K., Green, J., Peto, R., & Beral, V.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Liu, Bette
ORCID
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
387
Issue
10021
Pages
874-881
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01087-9
PMC
PMC5075047
OpenAlex
W2192905344
Cited by
259
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 18
FWCI
43.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (16491)
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K02700X/1)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
happiness, mortality, subjective well-being, self-rated health, ischemic heart disease, cancer mortality, stress, perceived control, relaxation, lifestyle factors, women's health, Million Women Study, anxiety and depression, smoking, socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, asthma, arthritis, cause-specific mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Happiness, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, Mortality, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review