Cited by 334Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Don't worry, be happy: positive affect and reduced 10-year incident coronary heart disease: The Canadian Nova Scotia Health Survey

Open access
Davidson, K. W., Mostofsky, E., Whang, W.·2010·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Positive affect is believed to predict cardiovascular health independent of negative affect. We examined whether higher levels of positive affect are associated with a lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in a large prospective study with 10 years of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the association between positive affect and cardiovascular events in 1739 adults (862 men and 877 women) in the 1995 Nova Scotia Health Survey. Trained nurses conducted Type A Structured Interviews, and coders rated the degree of outwardly displayed positive affect on a five-point scale. To test that positive affect predicts incident CHD when controlling for depressive symptoms and other negative affects, we used as covariates: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depressive symptoms Scale, the Cook Medley Hostility scale, and the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory. There were 145 (8.3%) acute non-fatal or fatal ischaemic heart disease events during the 14 916 person-years of observation. In a proportional hazards model controlling for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors, positive affect predicted CHD (adjusted HR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96 per point; P = 0.02), the covariate depressive symptoms continued to predict CHD as had been published previously in the same patients (HR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07 per point; P = 0.004) and hostility and anxiety did not (both P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this large, population-based study, increased positive affect was protective against 10-year incident CHD, suggesting that preventive strategies may be enhanced not only by reducing depressive symptoms but also by increasing positive affect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp603

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, K. W., Mostofsky, E., & Whang, W.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, K. W.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2010-02-17
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
1065-1070
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2168019533
Cited by
334
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25197-0-0-0, RR024156)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HC25197, R24HL076857, K24HL084034, R01HL080665, K23HL004458, HL088117, HL04458, HL-084034, HL-076857, N01 HC025197, HL-080665, P01HL088117)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
positive affect, coronary artery disease, depressive symptoms, hostility, trait anxiety, cardiovascular risk, ischemic heart disease, emotional well-being, cardiovascular disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Coronary Disease, Depressive Disorder, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nova Scotia, Risk Factors, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review