Cited by 268Historical and modern epidemiology studiesChronic Disease Management StrategiesHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

Co-occurring epidemics, syndemics, and population health

Open access
Tsai, Alexander C, Mendenhall, Emily, Trostle, James A, Kawachi, Ichiro·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

As originally theorised, three concepts underlie the notion of a syndemic: disease concentration, disease interaction, and the large-scale social forces that give rise to them. What makes the theory notable are its predictions about how interactions between epidemics amplify disease burden and about how public health planners can (or cannot) effectively intervene to mitigate this burden. The literature on syndemics is critically reviewed and key concepts for measuring effects on population health, including mutual causality, are introduced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30403-8

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

21 of 47 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    One commonly used specification in the literature encodes an assumption that epidemics A and B have no main effects and affect HIV jointly only when both are present.

    “Tsai and Venkataramani 19 showed, for example, that one of the most commonly employed specifications in the literature essentially encodes an assumption that epidemics A and B have null main effects and exert a joint effect on the HIV epidemic only when both A and B are present.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Tsai, 2016, Syndemics and health disparities: a methodological note, AIDS Behav source

      In “Dominant Approaches to Modeling in the Literature on Syndemics” (page unavailable), the paper says the commonly used sum-score specification encodes equal main effects, not null ones, and can produce a positive coefficient without any interaction. It says a different, categorical specification implies an effect only when all problems are present if its coefficients for one or two problems are estimated near zero; that is a conditional result, not an assumption encoded by the specification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Researchers and programme implementers using syndemic theory rarely advocate single-component interventions; multi-component calls are the norm.

    “Yet researchers and programme implementers drawing on the theory of syndemics rarely, if ever, advocate for single-component interventions; rather, calls for multi-component interventions are typically the norm.11–13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Operario, 2010, HIV in transgender communities: syndemic dynamics and a need for multicomponent interventions, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr source

      In “Not Just Testing and Condoms: Need for Multicomponent Interventions,” the paper calls multicomponent interventions necessary for HIV prevention in transgender communities and says several recent papers have called for them. It does not establish that researchers and programme implementers using syndemic theory generally rarely advocate single-component interventions or that multicomponent calls are the norm across the field. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] Li, 2016, Psychosocial syndemic associated with increased suicidal ideation among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China, Health Psychol source
    • cites [13] Chakrapani, 2017, Syndemics of depression, alcohol use, and victimisation, and their association with HIV-related sexual risk among men who have sex with men and transgender women in India, Glob Public Health source
  • Premisecitation

    In HIV treatment and prevention, appeals to syndemic theory are almost universally used to justify calls for complex, integrated, or multi-component interventions that target all co-occurring epidemics together.

    “In the field of HIV treatment and prevention, appeals to the theory of syndemics are near-universally used to justify calls for complex, integrated and/or multi-component interventions targeting all of the co-occurring epidemics in concert.11–13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] Operario, 2010, HIV in transgender communities: syndemic dynamics and a need for multicomponent interventions, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr source

      The “Not Just Testing and Condoms” section uses syndemic analysis to call for multicomponent HIV prevention interventions addressing interacting problems in transgender communities (page not provided). It does not establish that such appeals are near-universal across HIV treatment and prevention, or that interventions must target every co-occurring epidemic. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] Li, 2016, Psychosocial syndemic associated with increased suicidal ideation among men who have sex with men in Shanghai, China, Health Psychol source
    • cites [13] Chakrapani, 2017, Syndemics of depression, alcohol use, and victimisation, and their association with HIV-related sexual risk among men who have sex with men and transgender women in India, Glob Public Health source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The sum score does not illuminate either interaction or mutual causality.

    “While helpful, in some instances, for understanding the health effects of cumulative adversities, the sum score sheds light on the co-dynamics of neither interaction nor mutual causality.19”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Tsai, 2016, Syndemics and health disparities: a methodological note, AIDS Behav source
  • Findingcitation

    Most studies have used an empirical specification like the sum score of exposures common in childhood adversity research.

    “Rather, the overwhelming majority of studies14 have employed an empirical specification similar to that which has predominated in the literature on childhood adversity, i.e., a sum score of exposures.15–18”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [14] Tsai, 2015, Syndemics of psychosocial problems and HIV risk: a systematic review of empirical tests of the disease interaction concept, Soc Sci Med source
    • cites [15] Sameroff, 1987, Intelligence quotient scores of 4-year-old children: social-environmental risk factors, Pediatrics source
    • cites [16] Turner, 1995, Lifetime traumas and mental health: the significance of cumulative adversity, J Health Soc Behav source
    • cites [17] Felitti, 1998, Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study, Am J Prev Med source
    • cites [18] Montez, 2014, Cumulative childhood adversity, educational attainment, and active life expectancy among US adults, Demography source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The quantitative syndemics literature is increasingly discarding the uninformative language of additive associations.

    “while simultaneously becoming more accurate in its representations and increasingly discarding the uninformative19 language of “additive associations.””
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Tsai, 2016, Syndemics and health disparities: a methodological note, AIDS Behav source

      The Recommendations section (page unavailable) explicitly recommends modeling additive associations when that is the research objective; it calls the sum-score approach uninformative for detecting interactions, not the language of additive associations uninformative in general. The section on dominant modeling approaches says sum-score analyses appeared in 31 of 40 studies reviewed, rather than showing that the literature was increasingly discarding them. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    When multiple sufficient pathways exist, multi-component interventions targeting all pathways together are necessary for effective diarrhoeal disease control.

    “Under such conditions, multi-component intervention strategies targeting all of the pathways in concert are necessary for effective diarrhoeal disease control.26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Eisenberg, 2007, Integrating disease control strategies: balancing water sanitation and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrheal disease burden, Am J Public Health source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Tsai and Venkataramani examined the implicit assumptions in the sum score approach and showed how it could mislead programme implementers and policymakers.

    “Tsai and Venkataramani 19 then explored the implicit assumptions embedded in the sum score approach, highlighting the consequential ways in which programme implementers and public health policymakers might be led astray in their efforts to counter the large-scale forces leading to concentrated health disadvantage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Tsai, 2016, Syndemics and health disparities: a methodological note, AIDS Behav source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Power imbalances within relationships and men's beliefs about gender roles are thought to be risk factors for violence against women.

    “To take a specific example: power imbalances within relationships30, 31 and men’s beliefs about gender roles32 are thought to be risk factors for cases of violence against women.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [30] Conroy, 2016, Relationship power and sexual violence among HIV-positive women in rural Uganda, AIDS Behav source
    • cites [31] Hatcher, 2012, Sexual relationship power and depression among HIV-infected women in Rural Uganda, PLoS One source
      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [32] Shannon, 2012, Gender inequity norms are associated with increased male-perpetrated rape and sexual risks for HIV infection in Botswana and Swaziland, PLoS One source
      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These risk factors may be most likely to raise the risk of violence where women are structurally disadvantaged relative to men in land ownership and access to production, or where violence against women is normative.

    “These risk factors might be most likely to elevate the risk of violence in settings where women are structurally disadvantaged, either by law or by tradition, relative to men in terms of land ownership and access to other factors of production,33 or in settings where violence against women is normative.34, 35”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [33] Heise, 2015, Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys, Lancet Glob Health source

      The Results and Discussion (page numbers unavailable in our copy) associate discrimination in women's access to land and property with higher partner-violence risk, supporting the description of structurally disadvantaged settings. They do not show that the unspecified risk factors in the citing sentence are more likely to elevate risk specifically in those settings. The normative-violence clause is attached to other citations, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [34] Tsai, 2012, Proximate context of gender-unequal norms and women's HIV risk in sub-Saharan Africa, AIDS source

      The citation to this paper is attached to the clause about settings where violence against women is normative, not the land-ownership clause. The Methods measure norms about wife-beating, and the Results and Discussion relate those norms to condom use, but no passage assesses whether the cited risk factors raise the risk of violence more in such settings. Searched for violence risk and structural disadvantage. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [35] Tsai, 2013, Intimate partner violence and population mental health: why poverty and gender inequities matter, PLoS Med source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The authors are not aware of any examples of sufficient cause interaction in the syndemics literature.

    “We are unaware of any such examples in the literature on syndemics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Since its original formulation, syndemic theory has had little empirical support for either disease interaction or mutually causal epidemics.

    “Since its original conceptualization, the theory of syndemics has received scant empirical support either for its concept of disease interaction or for the model of mutually causal epidemics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The updated systematic search identified 31 new studies to combine with the 40 studies from the original review.

    “Of 87 records returned in the PubMed search, 23 met criteria for inclusion; of 119 records returned in the Google Scholar search, after excluding duplicates an additional 4 conference presentations, 2 journal articles, and 1 doctoral dissertation met criteria for inclusion. These 31 newly identified studies were combined with the 40 studies identified in the original systematic review”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The share of studies describing additive associations fell from 50% before the review to 29% after it, but the change was not statistically significant.

    “Second, the percentage of studies describing “additive associations” has also declined (20/40 [50%] vs. 9/31 [29%]; χ2=3·18, P=0·08).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The share of studies based solely on U.S. data fell from 80% before the review to 68% after it, but the change was not statistically significant.

    “First, the proportion of studies based solely on data collected in the U.S. has declined (32/40 [80%] vs. 21/31 [68%]; χ2=1·39, P=0·24).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Such response patterns may be considered a special case of the syndemic model in the left panel of the Figure and are often called sufficient cause interaction.

    “Response patterns of this type might be considered a special case of the syndemic model in the left panel of the Figure and are often referred to as a “sufficient cause interaction.”20, 21”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] VanderWeele, 2009, Sufficient cause interactions and statistical interactions, Epidemiology source
    • cites [21] VanderWeele, 2008, Empirical and counterfactual conditions for sufficient cause interactions, Biometrika source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In one framing of syndemic interaction, the disease burden from combined health risks is greater than the sum of the burdens from each risk considered separately.

    “At times, its framing language has focused specifically on interaction (or synergism): the disease burden attributable to health risks in combination exceeds the sum of the disease burden of the health risks when considered separately.9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Rothman, 1974, Synergy and antagonism in cause–effect relationships, Am J Epidemiol source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings reveal important methodological gaps in the literature.

    “These findings illustrate important methodological gaps in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The two models of co-occurring epidemics imply different treatment or prevention strategies, but the distinction between them has largely been blurred.

    “Notably, these two models imply different treatment or prevention strategies -- but the conceptual distinctions between the two have largely been blurred.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Disease interaction means that co-occurring epidemics interact at population and individual levels, producing mutually worsening health consequences.

    “The concept of disease interaction in the theory of syndemics holds that co-occurring epidemics interact at the level of populations and individuals, with mutually enhancing deleterious consequences for health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The most highly cited summary of syndemic theory describes examples that use only the language of interaction.

    “The most highly cited précis of the theory of syndemics10 describes numerous exemplars that draw exclusively on the language of interaction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Singer, 2003, Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context, Med Anthropol Q source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Disease concentration means that two or more epidemics occur together in particular times or places because of harmful social conditions.

    “The concept of disease concentration holds that two or more epidemics co-occur in particular temporal or geographical contexts due to harmful social conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sufficient cause interaction does not support a multi-component intervention targeting both epidemics A and B; instead, it suggests that a single-component intervention targeting either A or B would suffice.

    “Moreover, the presence of sufficient cause interaction does not militate for a multi-component intervention targeting both epidemics A and B for effective HIV prevention. Rather it suggests the opposite: that a single-component intervention targeting either epidemic A or B would suffice (because if either exposure were to be eliminated then the outcome could not occur).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Other statements of syndemic theory use the language of mutual causality or bidirectionality.

    “Other statements of the theory have instead adopted the language of mutual causality (or bidirectionality).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The conceptual basis for opposing single-component interventions does not necessarily follow from a close reading of syndemic theory.

    “Second, the conceptual foundation underlying the bias against single-component interventions does not necessarily follow from a close reading of the theory of syndemics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The original theory of syndemics rests on three ideas: disease clustering, disease interplay, and broad social forces.

    “As originally theorised, three concepts underlie the notion of a syndemic: disease concentration, disease interaction, and the large-scale social forces that give rise to them.1, 2”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Singer, 1996, A dose of drugs, a touch of violence, a case of AIDS: conceptualizing the SAVA syndemic, Free Inq Creative Sociol

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Singer, 2011, Toward a critical biosocial model of ecohealth in southern Africa: the HIV/AIDS and nutrition insecurity syndemic, Ann Anthropol Pract source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The canonical account of the triad of substance abuse, violence, and HIV emphasizes reciprocal causal pathways among these conditions.

    “The canonical elaboration of the unhappy triad of substance abuse, violence, and HIV,1 for example, focuses on the ways in which substance abuse increases the risk of violence and HIV acquisition, violent victimisation increases the risk of HIV acquisition and begets further substance abuse, and persons with HIV are often subjected to violence”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Singer, 1996, A dose of drugs, a touch of violence, a case of AIDS: conceptualizing the SAVA syndemic, Free Inq Creative Sociol

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Singer states that disease interaction occurs at both population and individual levels.

    “For example, Singer 27 notes: “Recently, in our efforts to further delineate the concept of syndemic [sic], we have drawn attention to the fact that disease interaction occurs at both the population and individual levels” (p.39).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Singer, 2006, A dose of drugs, a touch of violence, a case of AIDS, part 2: further conceptualizing the SAVA syndemic, Free Inq Creative Sociol

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Even though individual-level risk factors are generally accepted as more proximate and more amenable to causal attribution, shifting attention to large-scale social forces could yield more efficient population-level prevention of syndemic disease burden.

    “the field can achieve more efficient population-level prevention of the disease burden wrought by syndemics if attention is shifted toward eliminating the large-scale social forces that condition the distributions of individual-level risk factors or expedite their interaction and translation into diseased states.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [39] Rose, 1985, Sick individuals and sick populations, Int J Epidemiol source
    • cites [40] Rose, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The force of the multi-component recommendation for diarrhoeal disease control does not depend on syndemic synergy.

    “But the force of this programmatic recommendation is not contingent upon an appeal to syndemic synergy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The omission of population-level studies is significant and represents the individualistic fallacy.

    “The omission of population-level studies is significant -- representative of the “individualistic fallacy”28, 29”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] Riley, 1963

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [29] Diez-Roux, 1998, Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis, Am J Public Health source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    As theorised, syndemics are a complex, multilevel phenomenon.

    “As theorised, syndemics are a complex, multilevel phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Syndemic theory, and especially its disease interaction concept, involves multiple levels of analysis.

    “The theory of syndemics -- and, specifically, its concept of disease interaction -- involves multiple levels of analysis.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Singer, 2003, Syndemics and public health: reconceptualizing disease in bio-social context, Med Anthropol Q source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Data from multiple levels of analysis should be used to validate syndemic theory.

    “By implication, data from multiple levels of analysis should be mobilised in order to gain purchase on validating the theory.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Syndemic theory is principally a theory about population health.

    “Although the theory of syndemics is principally a theory about population health, the past two decades’ worth of quantitative literature motivated by the theory has generally focused on studying individuals, rather than populations -- and consequently has had very little to say about population health.”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three models of co-occurring epidemics-mutually causal, synergistically interacting, and serially causal-generate starkly different predictions about the potential effectiveness of treatment or prevention strategies.

    “This practice contributes to ongoing confusion in the field because the three different models of co-occurring epidemics generate starkly different predictions about the potential effectiveness of treatment or prevention strategies.”

    From Syndemics: a theory in search of data or data in search of a theory? (2018) · cites this paper as Tsai et al., 2017

    In “Measuring syndemics” (page unavailable), the paper says that two models—mutual causality and synergistic interaction—imply different treatment or prevention strategies. The “Interpretation” passage explains how their predictions for single-component interventions differ. Our copy does not describe a third, serially causal model or compare its intervention predictions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The sum score specification offers an appropriate test for none of the three models of co-occurring epidemics.

    “Irrespective of the model or models that emerge conceptually victorious from the scrum when the dust settles, this point is worth emphasizing: the sum score specification offers an appropriate test for none of these models.”

    From Syndemics: a theory in search of data or data in search of a theory? (2018) · cites this paper as Tsai et al., 2017

    In “Measuring syndemics” (page unavailable), the paper says a sum score sheds light on neither interaction nor mutual causality, supporting the claim for the two models it describes. It does not identify a third model or establish that a sum score is inappropriate for testing it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To date, the field has focused exclusively on investigating how individual-level outcomes can be explained by individual-level covariates.

    “To date, the field has focused exclusively on investigating how individual-level outcomes can be explained by individual-level covariates (Tsai & Burns, 2015; Tsai et al., 2017).”

    From Syndemics: a theory in search of data or data in search of a theory? (2018) · cites this paper as Tsai et al., 2017

    In “Syndemics and the ‘individualistic fallacy’” (page not provided), the paper says the field has largely focused on explaining individual-level outcomes with individual-level covariates. The claim’s “exclusively” overstates that qualified finding. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Syndemic research calls for multi-level analyses to understand interactions at the individual and population level.

    “Syndemic research also calls for multi-level analyses to understand interactions at the individual and population level [ 9 ].”
  • Systematic reviews have shown that most epidemiological studies in the syndemics literature, all using individual-level data, have attempted to document syndemics with the sum score specification.

    “Systematic reviews have shown that most epidemiological studies in this literature -- all of which are based on individual-level data -- have attempted to document the existence of syndemics by using the “sum score” specification (Tsai & Burns, 2015; Tsai et al., 2017).”

    From Syndemics: a theory in search of data or data in search of a theory? (2018) · cites this paper as Tsai et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • Newly included studies total 30, not 31

    Minor

    The 23 PubMed studies and 4 conference presentations, 2 journal articles, and 1 dissertation from Google Scholar add up to 30. The stated total of 31 is one higher.

    Reported 31 · recomputed 30

  • Newly identified study count does not match its components

    Minor

    The 23 PubMed studies and 4 conference presentations, 2 journal articles, and 1 dissertation from Google Scholar total 30, not 31. The stated combined total of 71 relies on the unsupported count of 31.

    Reported 31 · recomputed 30

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Singer, 2006, A dose of drugs, a touch of violence, a case of AIDS, part 2: further conceptualizing the SAVA syndemic, Free Inq Creative Sociol, 34, 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, A. C., Mendenhall, E., Trostle, J. A., & Kawachi, I.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Trinity College (US)
Corresponding author
Tsai, Alexander C
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
389
Issue
10072
Pages
978-982
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2592578483
Cited by
268
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • US National Institutes of Health (K23MH096620)
  • US National Science Foundation (EAR-1360330)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
syndemic, disease interaction, social determinants of health, population health, fundamental causes, HIV, tuberculosis, health disadvantage
MeSH terms
Population Health, Humans, Syndrome, HIV Infections, Cost of Illness, Epidemics, Coinfection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review