Cited by 245Wastewater Treatment and ReuseFecal contamination and water qualityPublic Health and Environmental Issues

Excreta disposal for rural areas and small communities

Edmund G. Wagner, Jacqueline Lanoix·1959·Medical Journal of Australia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1959.tb88741.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, E. G., & Lanoix, J.
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
1959-05
Volume
1
Issue
20
Pages
670-670
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W1652742507
Cited by
245
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
Keywords
excreta disposal, rural sanitation, small communities, sanitation systems
MeSH terms
Body Fluids, Humans, Residence Characteristics, Rural Health, Rural Population, Sanitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review